IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v14y2024i1p41-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of Stakeholder Theory in a Small Public Sector Accountability Unit: An Indonesian Village Government Case

Author

Listed:
  • Irmansyah -
  • Nafsiah Mohamed
  • Intan Salwani Mohamed
  • Dyah Setyaningrum

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the accountability model in a small unit of public sector organization. Hence, it elaborates on the elements that should be considered in developing an accountability model by reviewing the literature on accountability in general, its practices in the public sector organization, and the numerous regulations covering the village administration in Indonesia. The accountability of village administration in Indonesia is related to the village community and the upper-level government entities. As the lowest-level government unit, the leader and his/her administration should be accountable to the village community and the upper-level government entities, such as districts/cities, provinces, and related ministries at central governments with various needs. Thus, village administration focuses more on meeting the needs of the upper-level government entities rather than fulfilling the needs of the village community as primary stakeholders. The strategies in developing the accountability model for a small unit of public sector organization need to consider the relation between village administration as an agent and other primary stakeholders as principals. The study adds to the theoretical knowledge of the accountability model for a small unit of public sector organization, particularly in Indonesian village administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Irmansyah - & Nafsiah Mohamed & Intan Salwani Mohamed & Dyah Setyaningrum, 2024. "The Application of Stakeholder Theory in a Small Public Sector Accountability Unit: An Indonesian Village Government Case," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 41-56, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:41-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/download/21363/16740
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/21363
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lührmann, Anna & Marquardt, Kyle L. & Mechkova, Valeriya, 2020. "Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 811-820, August.
    2. Ricardo Corrêa Gomes, 2006. "Stakeholder management in the local government decision-making area: evidences from a triangulation study with the English local government," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 10(spe), pages 77-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhard Reinsberg & Daniel O Shaw & Louis Bujnoch, 2024. "Revisiting the security–development nexus: Human security and the effects of IMF adjustment programmes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(1), pages 72-95, January.
    2. William Akoto, 2022. "Accountability and cyber conflict: examining institutional constraints on the use of cyber proxies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(3), pages 311-332, May.
    3. Abrams M. E. Tagem, 2023. "The dynamic effects of aid and taxes on government spending," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(6), pages 1656-1687, December.
    4. Arayankalam, Jithesh & Krishnan, Satish, 2021. "Relating foreign disinformation through social media, domestic online media fractionalization, government's control over cyberspace, and social media-induced offline violence: Insights from the agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Helmut K. Anheier & Markus Lang & Edward L. Knudsen, 2023. "Introducing the Berggruen Governance Index I: Conceptual and methodological framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S4), pages 5-15, October.
    7. Zakariae Laassili & Zouhair Ejbari, 2023. "The Participatory Approach applied to Quality Management : A Perceptual Study of the Determinants of Satisfying Stakeholders' Expectations regarding the Quality of Health Public Services [L'Approch," Post-Print hal-04365693, HAL.
    8. Steffen Eckhard & Vytautas Jankauskas & Elena Leuschner & Ian Burton & Tilman Kerl & Rita Sevastjanova, 2023. "The performance of international organizations: a new measure and dataset based on computational text analysis of evaluation reports," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 753-776, October.
    9. José Ángel Alcántara-Lizárraga & Alexandra Jima-González, 2022. "Accountability, Corruption, and Opposition Groups: Evidence from Latin America," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Nicolás Ajzenman & Cevat Giray Aksoy & Martin Fiszbein & Carlos A. Molina, 2021. "(Successful) Democracies Breed Their Own Support," NBER Working Papers 29167, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Tomic, Slobodan & Rauh, William Jonathan, 2023. "How Political Culture Shapes Horizontal Accountability Outcomes: Evidence from 62 Countries," SocArXiv uf3nw, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:41-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.