IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ajfa88/v2y2010i1p68-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equity Valuation Using Price Multiples: A Comparative Study for BRICKS

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Sehgal
  • Asheesh Pandey

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the efficacy of three value drivers namely, earnings per share, book value and sales for developing stock price forecasts using two performance evaluation criteria- 1) Root Mean Squared Error and 2) Thail Inequality Coefficient. We employ data for BRICKS economies excluding Russia from 1993-2007. We conduct our analysis in three phases. In phase one we find that price to book value is the best standalone price multiple for the Asian economies (India, China and South Korea) while price to earnings does a better job for equity valuation in case of Brazil and South Africa. In the next phase we show that combination of value drivers do not significantly improve price forecast vis-à-vis standalone multiples. Our findings are in contrast with those for developed markets as shown by Penman (1996). We also find that in Indian context market regression is a better tool for price forecasting compared to sector regression as larger number of observations result in better estimator for our forecast equation. Our findings are extremely relevant for equity analysts and portfolio managers who are continuously involved in equity evaluation and developing global asset allocation strategies. Keywords- Price Earnings Ratio, Price to Book Value ratio, Relative Valuation, Price Multiples, Discounted Cash flowsJEL Classifications- C51, C52, G11, G15

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Sehgal & Asheesh Pandey, 2010. "Equity Valuation Using Price Multiples: A Comparative Study for BRICKS," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 6891-6891, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:68-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa/article/view/283
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Da, Zhi & Schaumburg, Ernst, 2011. "Relative valuation and analyst target price forecasts," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 161-192, February.
    2. Alford, Aw, 1992. "The Effect Of The Set Of Comparable Firms On The Accuracy Of The Price Earnings Valuation Method," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 94-108.
    3. Sanjay Sehgal & Asheesh Pandey, 2010. "Equity Valuation Using Price Multiples: Evidence from India," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 6(1), pages 89-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanjay Sehgal & Asheesh Pandey, 2013. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Net Stock Issues and Returns in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(4), pages 505-515, November.
    2. Harish Kumar Singla & Anand Prakash, 2021. "Financial determinants of value based performance of construction firms in India," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(4), pages 1025-1050, October.
    3. Ganapathy G Gangadharan & N. Suresh, 2022. "Interrogation of A Bubble in the Indian Market," Papers 2207.13444, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavelle, Sean, 2016. "Market dynamics when participants rely on relative valuation," Economics Discussion Papers 2016-42, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Gu, Chen & Guo, Xu & Zhang, Chengping, 2022. "Analyst target price revisions and institutional herding," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    4. Waleed Khalid & Kashif Ur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif, 2019. "The Impact of Merger and Acquisition Firms on Stock Market Bubble," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 335-342, March.
    5. Wen-Shiung Lee, 2013. "Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(15-16), pages 1473-1494, December.
    6. Bogdan Alexandru DRĂGOI & Ion STANCU & Adrian MITROI & Andrei Tudor STANCU, 2016. "Financial Investment Companies (SIFS) Relative Valuation and Fundamentals," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(2), pages 25-40.
    7. Ivanovski Zoran & Narasanov Zoran & Ivanovska Nadica, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Stocks’ Valuation Models at MSE," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-23, June.
    8. Petaibanlue, Jirada & Walker, Martin & Lee, Edward, 2015. "When did analyst forecast accuracy benefit from increased cross-border comparability following IFRS adoption in the EU?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 278-291.
    9. Alex PARKHOMENKO & I. IVASHKOVSKAYA & I. KUZNETSOV, 2008. "Country Risk Adjustments to Market Multiples-Based Valuation in Emerging Markets: Empirical Study for Russia," EcoMod2008 23800103, EcoMod.
    10. WS Nel, 2015. "An Optimal Peer Group Selection Strategy for Multiples-Based Modelling in the South African Equity Market," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 30-46.
    11. Andreou, Christoforos K. & Lambertides, Neophytos & Panayides, Photis M., 2021. "Distress risk anomaly and misvaluation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    12. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    13. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:174-211 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Engelberg, Joseph & McLean, R. David & Pontiff, Jeffrey, 2020. "Analysts and anomalies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
    15. Frank Asche & Bård Misund, 2016. "Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1264538-126, December.
    16. Александров Я.Б., 2019. "Оценка Стоимости Компании На Развивающихся Рынках: Сравнительный Подход," Журнал Экономика и математические методы (ЭММ), Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ), vol. 55(3), pages 109-123, июль.
    17. Jang Youn Cho, 1994. "Determinants Of Earnings‐Price Ratios: A Reexamination," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 105-120, March.
    18. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2017. "Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 275-304.
    19. Yang, Yan & Copeland, Laurence, 2014. "The Effects of Sentiment on Market Return and Volatility and The Cross-Sectional Risk Premium of Sentiment-affected Volatility," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2014/12, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    20. Markus Buxbaum & Wolfgang Schultze & Samuel L. Tiras, 2023. "Do analysts’ target prices stabilize the stock market?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 763-816, October.
    21. Ozdenoren, Emre & Yuan, Kathy, 2012. "Stock market tournaments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119047, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ajfa88:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:68-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ajfa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.