IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v16y2024i1p591-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of S. Khoruzhyi's Ideas of Energetic Hesychasm in the Educational Strategies of Postmodern Society

Author

Listed:
  • Vitalii Ihnatiev

    (Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Language and Humanities, Donetsk National Medical University)

  • Oksana Patlaichuk

    (Candidate of Philosophical Sciences (PhD in Philosophy), Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Philosophy and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding)

  • Olga Stupak

    (Senior Lecturer of the Department of Psychology, Philosophy and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding)

  • Andrii Bobryk

    (PhD in Theology, Master of History and Law, Researcher at the Center for the Study of the Heritage of New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th Century)

  • Hennadii Moskalyk

    (Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Psychology, Pedagogy and Philosophy, Kremenchuk National University named after Mykhailo Ostrogradskyi)

  • Andrii Shymanovych

    (PhD in Theology, Postdoctoral Researcher of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies, Dragomanov Ukrainian State University)

Abstract

Through the prism of the study of the theology of Hesychasm the authors of this article consider the philosophical work of S. Khoruzhyi as a present-day system of non-classical pedagogical paradigm. On the other hand, this paradigm is a philosophically framed historical tradition of Orthodox ontological experience of human existence, which in our time has gone beyond the end of history. Moving beyond confessional boundaries into a universal philosophical meta-anthropological project provides a heuristic effect for the construction of spiritual pedagogy as well as for its synergy with the educational strategies and spiritual practices of the common man of the postmodern era. The authors sought to identify the basic intentions of religion and postmodern consciousness, and to characterize S. Khoruzhyi's theosophical paradigm in terms of its unconscious and unintentional correlation with the social philosophy of pedagogical of postmodernism. For this purpose we used comparative typological and meaningful methinks, as well as elements of hermeneutics and intertextual analysis. As a result of the study the authors formulated a number of conclusions and results. The most general one defines the peculiarity of S. Khoruzhogo's narrative, in which the philosopher not only insists but also systematically embeds Hesychasm in the context of the post-non-classical philosophical and pedagogical paradigm. In essence, S. Khoruzhyi forms an alternative to the classical philosophical paradigm, which (even despite the author's formal objections) is open to a horizontal postmodern dialogue and constructed in a personal Hesychasm practice " bottom-up" from -because of "human energy".

Suggested Citation

  • Vitalii Ihnatiev & Oksana Patlaichuk & Olga Stupak & Andrii Bobryk & Hennadii Moskalyk & Andrii Shymanovych, 2024. "The Use of S. Khoruzhyi's Ideas of Energetic Hesychasm in the Educational Strategies of Postmodern Society," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 591-607, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:591-607
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/6759/4782
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:591-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.