IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v16y2024i1p326-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Sports Achievements of Participants in Cheerleading Competitions by Rationalizing Refereeing

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Synytsya

    (PhD in Physical Education and Sport, Assistant Professor of the Department of Physical Culture and Sports, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine)

  • Sergiy Synytsya

    (PhD in Physical Education and Sport, Assistant Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education, Adaptive and Mass Physical Culture, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine)

  • Lina Rybalko

    (Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sports, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine)

  • Oksana Kornosenko

    (Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education, Adaptive and Mass Physical Culture, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine)

  • Valeriy Zhamardiy

    (Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine)

Abstract

Cheerleading is a popular sport that is developing and increasing the number of fans. Cheerleading is a subjective sport and therefore it requires a lot of attention. The aim of the study is to investigate, identify and scientifically substantiate effective ways of rationalizing the refereeing of cheerleading competitions. 105 cheerleading judges took part in the study. Based on the results of the survey, an experimental group of judges of II and III categories was formed, which consisted of 73 young judges (hereinafter referred to as novice judges), who were involved in the experiment. Among them, 35.6% have the II judge category, 64.4% – III. Among novice judges, 23.3% have 3 years of experience as judges, 42.5% – 2 years, the rest – 31.2% – 1 year. The conducted questionnaire of cheerleading judges showed that certain difficulties arise in the judging process: distraction of own athletes and their parents, judges or competition organizers (72.6%); a large number of athletes in the team (up to 24), a significant number of numbers in one nomination (11.0%); long and loud music (8.2%); violation of hygiene requirements (weak or significant lighting, unventilated room, draft, etc.) (8.2%). In addition, there is a need to store the performances in memory, for a qualitative assessment of all competitive performances. As a result of the conducted research, methodical recommendations were developed, as well as developed evaluation symbols and marks for use during competition that will help judges to qualitatively and fairly evaluate competitive performances; remember performances and correctly distribute participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Synytsya & Sergiy Synytsya & Lina Rybalko & Oksana Kornosenko & Valeriy Zhamardiy, 2024. "Evaluation of Sports Achievements of Participants in Cheerleading Competitions by Rationalizing Refereeing," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 326-342, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:326-342
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/6402/4768
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    judge; competition; cheerleading; training; evaluation; improvement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:326-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.