This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Make or buy on the Russian railway? Coase, Williamson, and Tsar Nicholas II Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Russell Pittman ()
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Springer in its journal Economic Change and Restructuring .
Volume (Year): 40 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Pages: 207-221
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:40:y:2007:i:3:p:207-221Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=113294
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Public utilities ; Restructuring ; Vertical separation ; Transactions cost economics ; Railways ; Russia ; D23 ; L14 ; L22 ; L43 ; L51 ; L90 ; L92 ; N74 ; Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: CREMER, Helmuth & CRÉMER, Jacques & DE DONDER, Philippe, 2006.
"Legal vs Ownership Unbundling in Network Industries ,"
IDEI Working Papers
405, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Marc Ivaldi & Gerard Mccullough, 2008.
"Subadditivity Tests for Network Separation with an Application to U.S. Railroads ,"
Review of Network Economics ,
Concept Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 159-171, March.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Christian Growitsch & Heike Wetzel, 2006.
"Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis ,"
IWH Discussion Papers
5-06, Halle Institute for Economic Research.
[Downloadable!]
Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean, 1986.
"Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms ,"
Journal of Political Economy ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(3), pages 614-41, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Janusz Ordover & Russell Pittman & Paul Clyde, 2001.
"Competition Policy for Natural Monopolies in a Developing Market Economy ,"
Industrial Organization
0111004, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Joskow, Paul L, 1991.
"The Role of Transaction Cost Economics in Antitrust and Public Utility Regulatory Policies ,"
Journal of Law, Economics and Organization ,
Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 53-83, Special I.
Russell Pittman & Sergei Guriev & Guido Friebel & Anna Tomova & Elizaveta Cheviakhova, 2005.
"Railroad Restructuring in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe: One Solution for All Problems? ,"
Industrial Organization
0504021, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Dahlman, Carl J, 1979.
"The Problem of Externality ,"
Journal of Law & Economics ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 141-62, April.
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? There are over 21000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service .
This page was last updated on 2009-10-29.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .