IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jso/coejbm/v3y2015i3p397-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Current State of Online Reputation of Public Institutions and the Possibilities of Its Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Dorcak

    (University of Prešov in Presov, Slovak Republic)

  • František Pollak
  • Nella Svetozarovováa

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of reputation, especially with the focus on a current phenomenon of reputation in the digital world of the Internet - online reputation - of selected public institutions operating in the domestic market. Sentiments of specifically selected twenty public universities and colleges are rated in two dimensions: virtual and real. The primary aim of this article is to investigate the existence of a statistically significant correlation between reputation of researched subjects in the real and virtual world. In conclusion paper presents options and recommendations for optimizing virtual reputation and highlights the differences of perception of reputation in the traditional and in the virtual market by understanding the differences between factors affecting traditional reputation and factors affecting reputation in digital world.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Dorcak & František Pollak & Nella Svetozarovováa, 2015. "Analysis of the Current State of Online Reputation of Public Institutions and the Possibilities of Its Improvement," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 3(3), pages 397-405, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jso:coejbm:v:3:y:2015:i:3:p:397-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JBM/Vol3/No3/Article2,pp.397-405.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jso:coejbm:v:3:y:2015:i:3:p:397-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.