IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ite/iteeco/240214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixture model for self-assessed stress at work across EU 163

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Capecchi
  • Francesca Di Iorio
  • Nunzia Nappo

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Capecchi & Francesca Di Iorio & Nunzia Nappo, 2024. "A mixture model for self-assessed stress at work across EU 163," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 78(2), pages 163-174, April-Jun.
    • Handle: RePEc:ite:iteeco:240214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sieds.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/14-03211RV_Capecchi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Cerulli & Rosaria Simone & Francesca Di Iorio & Domenico Piccolo & Christopher F Baum, 2022. "Fitting mixture models for feeling and uncertainty for rating data analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 22(1), pages 195-223, March.
    2. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    3. Lígia Amâncio & Maria Helena Santos, 2021. "Gender Equality and Modernity in Portugal. An Analysis on the Obstacles to Gender Equality in Highly Qualified Professions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 477-493, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatriz Tovar & David Boto-García & José Francisco Baños Pino, 2024. "Meeting externalities: The effects of educational training on support for tourism activities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(3), pages 785-805, May.
    2. Antonio Calcagnì & Luigi Lombardi, 2022. "Modeling random and non-random decision uncertainty in ratings data: a fuzzy beta model," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(1), pages 145-173, March.
    3. Rosaria Simone, 2022. "On finite mixtures of Discretized Beta model for ordered responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 828-855, September.
    4. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2022. "A mixture model for ordinal variables measured on semantic differential scales," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 98-123.
    5. Corduas, Marcella, 2022. "Gender differences in the perception of inflation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "A Rating Scale Mixture Model to Account for the Tendency to Middle and Extreme Categories," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 682-716, December.
    7. Heng Xu & Nan Zhang, 2022. "From Contextualizing to Context Theorizing: Assessing Context Effects in Privacy Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7383-7401, October.
    8. Gerhard Tutz, 2022. "Ordinal Trees and Random Forests: Score-Free Recursive Partitioning and Improved Ensembles," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(2), pages 241-263, July.
    9. Rosaria Simone, 2023. "Uncertainty Diagnostics of Binomial Regression Trees for Ordered Rating Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 79-105, April.
    10. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2023. "Quasi-experimental network-based design for semantic analysis of small clusters of bi-polar online reviews," SocArXiv v7u3h, Center for Open Science.
    11. Ribecco, Nunziata & D'Uggento, Angela Maria & Labarile, Angela, 2022. "What influences the perception of immigration in Italian adolescents? An analysis with CUB models for rating data," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    12. Mazzi Gian Luigi & Mitchell James & Carausu Florabela, 2021. "Measuring and Communicating the Uncertainty in Official Economic Statistics," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 289-316, June.
    13. Gerhard Tutz, 2020. "Modelling heterogeneity: on the problem of group comparisons with logistic regression and the potential of the heterogeneous choice model," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 517-542, September.
    14. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 477-493, September.
    15. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Anna Gottard, 2019. "Discussion of “The class of CUB models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 441-444, September.
    16. Maria Cecilia Eduardo & Maria Helena Santos & Ana Lúcia Teixeira, 2023. "Gender and Politics: A Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of the Statutes of Brazilian and Portuguese Political Parties," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Capecchi, Stefania & Amato, Mario & Sodano, Valeria & Verneau, Fabio, 2019. "Understanding beliefs and concerns towards palm oil: Empirical evidence and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2019. "Discussion of ‘The class of CUB models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence’ by Domenico Piccolo and Rosaria Simone," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 459-463, September.
    19. Rosaria Simone, 2021. "An accelerated EM algorithm for mixture models with uncertainty for rating data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 691-714, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ite:iteeco:240214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudio Ceccarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/siedsea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.