IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v8y2016i4p359-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary—Smart Service Systems: Bridging the Silos

Author

Listed:
  • Richard C. Larson

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

To strengthen service science as an academic discipline, we need to bridge disciplinary silos. A strongly connected network of silo-to-silo bridges can facilitate a generation of foundational knowledge and best practices needed to foster substantive continuing innovation in service system design. Such innovation can have an enormous impact on service system performance and thus quality of life for users of these systems. Drawing from insights gained from discussions at the “Smarter Service Systems through Innovation Partnerships and Transdisciplinary Research” workshop, held by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the National Science Foundation during November 20–21, 2014, we explore the challenges facing researchers, system designers, and industry players seeking to drive innovation in service system design. We then present ideas in three major areas for surmounting those challenges: (a) designing service systems with human beings (not just technology) in mind, (b) fostering transdisciplinary research, and (c) forging new kinds of partnerships among diverse stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard C. Larson, 2016. "Commentary—Smart Service Systems: Bridging the Silos," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 359-367, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:359-367
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2016.0140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/serv.2016.0140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2016.0140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:359-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.