IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v41y1993i4p655-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worldwide Nuclear Coalition Games: A Valuation of Strategic Offensive and Defensive Forces

Author

Listed:
  • Jerome Bracken

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut)

  • Martin Shubik

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut)

Abstract

Methods are proposed for the valuation of strategic offensive and defensive force structures, with emphasis on the consideration of incentives for the formation of coalitions. Coalitions consist of subsets of the nuclear weapons states, together with the nonnuclear weapons states taken as components of the total value target inventory. The basic approach is to formulate and solve two worldwide nuclear coalition games. In the first game, the first striking coalition is retaliated against by the surviving weapons of the second striking coalition, minimizing the objective function of the first striking coalition. In the second game, the surviving weapons of the second striking coalition are used to maximize its own objective function. The objective function in both models is the percent of surviving value. The games differ substantially. Computational results are presented for all possible coalitions of nuclear weapons states and neutrals. Offensive weapons, defensive weapons, and value target data bases are varied. Results are very sensitive to coalition composition, the number of value targets, and the number of offensive and defensive weapons.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerome Bracken & Martin Shubik, 1993. "Worldwide Nuclear Coalition Games: A Valuation of Strategic Offensive and Defensive Forces," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 655-668, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:41:y:1993:i:4:p:655-668
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.41.4.655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.4.655
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.41.4.655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oderanti, Festus Oluseyi & De Wilde, Philippe, 2010. "Dynamics of business games with management of fuzzy rules for decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 96-109, November.
    2. Martin Shubik, 2018. "The Paradox of Competition: Power, Markets, and Money - Who Gets What, When, How"," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2118R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    3. Martin Shubik, 2018. "Who Gets What, When, How? Power, Organization, Markets, Money and the Allocation of Resources," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 3018, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Martin Shubik, 2018. "Who Gets What, When, How" Power, Organization, Markets, Money and the Allocation of Resources," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2118, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Martin Shubik, 2011. "The Present and Future of Game Theory," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1808, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:41:y:1993:i:4:p:655-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.