IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i5p2779-2798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offsetable Derivatives and Investor Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Jed J. Neilson

    (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • K. Philip Wang

    (Fisher School of Accounting, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611)

  • Christopher D. Williams

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Biqin Xie

    (Office of Financial Research, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, District of Columbia 20220)

Abstract

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) allows banks to offset derivative assets against derivative liabilities with the same counterparty and report only the net amount on the balance sheet. Derivative offsetting under international financial reporting standards (IFRS) is much more restrictive, resulting in the single largest difference in balance sheet presentation between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Two important factors dominate the standard-setting discussion on this issue: (1) whether these derivatives are informative about bank risk and (2) whether disclosing them substitutes for recognition on the balance sheet. Using a hand-collected global sample of banks, we first show that offsetable derivatives are positively associated with bank risk, based on multiple risk measures, suggesting that these derivatives are informative about bank risk. Next, exploiting the differential accounting treatment across U.S. GAAP and IFRS banks, we find that disclosure versus recognition of offsetable derivatives matters for the risk assessment of equity investors but not for that of (more sophisticated) credit default swap investors. Additional tests corroborate the inference that investor sophistication helps explain the differential investor assessment of recognized versus disclosed offsetable derivatives. Collectively, our findings suggest that offsetable derivatives convey information about bank risk and that, for less sophisticated investors, disclosing them may not substitute for recognizing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Jed J. Neilson & K. Philip Wang & Christopher D. Williams & Biqin Xie, 2024. "Offsetable Derivatives and Investor Risk Assessment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2779-2798, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:5:p:2779-2798
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:5:p:2779-2798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.