IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v43y2024i3p506-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Browsing the Aisles or Browsing the App? How Online Grocery Shopping is Changing What We Buy

Author

Listed:
  • Sai Chand Chintala

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

  • Jūra Liaukonytė

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

  • Nathan Yang

    (SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

Abstract

This paper investigates the systematic differences between online and offline grocery shopping baskets using data from approximately two million brick-and-mortar and Instacart trips. We apply unsupervised machine learning algorithms agnostic to the shopping channel to identify what constitutes a typical food shopping trip for each household. We find that food shopping basket variety is significantly lower for online shopping trips as measured by the number of unique food categories and items purchased. Within a given household, the Instacart baskets are more similar to each other as compared with offline baskets with twice as many overlapping items between successive trips to the same retailer. These results suggest a potential link between online grocery shopping environments and heightened consumer inertia, which may lead to stronger brand loyalty and pose challenges for new entrants in establishing a customer base. Furthermore, Instacart baskets have 13% fewer fresh vegetables and 5%–7% fewer impulse purchases, such as candy, bakery desserts, and savory snacks, which are not compensated for by alternative or additional shopping trips. We discuss the implications of these systematic shopping basket differences for competition, product management, retailers, consumers, and online platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sai Chand Chintala & Jūra Liaukonytė & Nathan Yang, 2024. "Browsing the Aisles or Browsing the App? How Online Grocery Shopping is Changing What We Buy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 506-522, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:506-522
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.0292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0292
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.0292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:506-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.