IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsds00/v9y2018i3p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principal-Agent Analysis on How Legal Risks Affect Audit Fees and Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Yahel Giat

    (Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel)

Abstract

This article develops a principal-agent multi-period model that ties legal risks, auditing fees and internal accounting practices. The principal is the auditing firm and the agent is the client firm. The client firm can improve its credibility by improving its internal auditing practices, which results in lower audit fees to the auditor firm. It is found that in equilibrium, there is a credibility threshold level that firms should meet and which depends on the legal risks associated with accounting practices and audit errors. If, as result of strict legislation, a firm is below the threshold it will pay above optimal auditing fees. In this case, the firm should make a single, immediate improvement to reach the optimal level. Additionally, only firms whose credibility is close to the threshold are affected if government increases legal scrutiny. More credible firms are not adversely affected by the stricter legal climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahel Giat, 2018. "Principal-Agent Analysis on How Legal Risks Affect Audit Fees and Quality," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 113-126, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:113-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSDS.2018070106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.