IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jabim0/v10y2019i3p22-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Globalization and Trade Openness in China and India: Impacts and Policies of Mitigating Adverse Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Rajib Bhattacharyya

    (Goenka College of Commerce and Business Administration, Kolkata, India)

Abstract

One of the most intensely debated topics in recent day world economic scenario is benefits and costs financial integration and globalization across the globe. Some economists argue that increased openness to capital flows has, by and large, proven essential for countries aiming to upgrade from lower to middle income status, while significantly enhancing stability among industrialized countries. While the counter opinion suggests that it has been widely disastrous as increasing capital account liberalization and unfettered capital flows is a serious impediment to global financial stability. Legal restrictions on cross-border capital flows (capital controls) are the most commonly used measures of the degree of financial openness, as revealed from the earlier empirical studies. The objective of the present study is to examine the nature and extent of financial globalization in context of the global crisis in case of two Asian giants India and China. The basic objective is to establish both short and long run relationship between growth in GDP and five macroeconomic variables- trade (as percentage of GDP), real effective exchange rate, FDI net inflows (as percentage of GDP), external debt (as percentage of GNI) and net financial flows (as a ratio to GDP) in selected Asian countries (China and India). It focuses on related policy measures adopted to curb the possible adverse effects of financial and trade liberalization. It is supported by secondary time series data analysis for the period 1990 to 2014.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajib Bhattacharyya, 2019. "Financial Globalization and Trade Openness in China and India: Impacts and Policies of Mitigating Adverse Effects," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 22-48, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:22-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJABIM.2019070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:22-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.