IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v20y2024i2p267-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising standard set of bids evaluation criteria for selecting adequate contractor

Author

Listed:
  • Rudzani Glen Muthelo
  • Clinton O. Aigbavboa
  • Bankole Osita Awuzie

Abstract

Selection of an adequate contractor is undoubtedly crucial to a project's success. This decision often happens at the bids evaluation stage when the client is afforded an opportunity to award the bid to the competent contractor based on the criteria that eventually fulfils his/her objectives. There is, however, no consensus regarding standardised bid evaluation criteria. The purpose of the current study is to conceptualise a standard set of criteria for evaluating construction bids. A two-stage research approach was used, thus the review of literature to identify the criteria used for contractor selection and secondly the use of survey questionnaire. The nine identified bid evaluation criteria were quality, technical ability, experience, price, financial soundness, management capabilities, health and safety, human resources as well as plant and equipment. Meeting the objectives of the client greatly depend on the usage of standard evaluating criteria for the selection of adequate contractor.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudzani Glen Muthelo & Clinton O. Aigbavboa & Bankole Osita Awuzie, 2024. "Conceptualising standard set of bids evaluation criteria for selecting adequate contractor," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 267-285.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:267-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:267-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.