IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v5y2014i2p157-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not enough markets to sustain an invisible hand metaphor

Author

Listed:
  • Hendrik Van den Berg
  • Matthew Van den Berg

Abstract

The invisible hand metaphor dates to the 18th century but only gained prominence after neoclassical analysis came to dominate economic thinking late 19th century. Neoclassical economists rigorously established the assumptions necessary for an economy to operate in accordance with the metaphor, including that all economic activity passes through efficient markets. But, real markets are never efficient or even competitive, and most provisioning occurs outside markets in households, social settings, business organisations, and government. Yet, mainstream economics continues to model the economy in accordance with the metaphor. This paper delegitimises the metaphor by means of a simple exercise, easily understood by beginning economics students, to use wide-ranging inter-disciplinary evidence to estimate the percentage of human economic interactions that occur in competitive markets. Conclusion: the proportion of human economic interactions carried out in competitive markets is much too small for the invisible hand metaphor to accurately describe an economic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendrik Van den Berg & Matthew Van den Berg, 2014. "Not enough markets to sustain an invisible hand metaphor," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 157-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:5:y:2014:i:2:p:157-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=63510
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:5:y:2014:i:2:p:157-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.