IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v14y2021i3p212-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty in work motivation theory-building

Author

Listed:
  • Yundong Huang

Abstract

This article responds to Locke and Latham's (2004) masterpiece, "What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century." In their paper, Locke and Latham reviewed major motivation theories and emphasised motivation theory development's future direction, proposing six recommendations to build a more valid, more complete theory. Seventeen years later, however, the literature lacks this type of refined theory, and what has prevented its development remains unclear. This article discusses previous theory-building attempts' hidden assumptions. It is also the first article to point out sources of uncertainty that have prevented scholars' creation of an integrated work motivation theory in the way Locke and Latham proposed. Understanding such sources of uncertainty is important to theory-building; indeed, it is more important than proposing a new theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yundong Huang, 2021. "Uncertainty in work motivation theory-building," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 212-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:212-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118972
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:212-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.