IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v3y2013i1p21-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hierarchical and fuzzy competitiveness evaluation methodology based on DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Dia
  • Fouad Ben Abdelaziz
  • Yoser Gadhoum

Abstract

In this paper, we present a fuzzy multi-criteria methodology for measuring the competitiveness of heterogeneous firms in an economy where several competitiveness indicators are considered ambiguous or fuzzy. We homogenise the companies into groups to better address their specificities enabling a better identification and definition of the comparison criteria in each specific grouping. In this context, the competitiveness of a company in an economy was seen as the composite of its competitiveness in its sector with that of its sector in this economy. The methodology, in two phases, consists in determining, first, the fuzzy performances and indices of competitiveness of companies and sectors in their groups using the DEA approach; then, examining the fuzzy indices of competitiveness of these companies in the economy. We illustrate the methodology in the competitiveness measurement of several companies from different sectors in an economy and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Dia & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Yoser Gadhoum, 2013. "A hierarchical and fuzzy competitiveness evaluation methodology based on DEA," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 21-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:21-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52456
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:21-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.