IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijitma/v15y2016i2p168-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilitarian characteristics reducing guilt: perceived values in the justification of choice

Author

Listed:
  • Emílio José Montero Arruda-Filho
  • Silvia Biffignandi

Abstract

Research shows that technology consumers' preferences depend on combinations of utilitarian and hedonic factors. Consumers focus on fashion, social status, differentiation from others, innovation, and bundled characteristics to feel unique. This research considers preference factors including hedonism, utilitarianism, bundle preference, social values, and technological environment, which influence consumers' behaviour and purchasing decisions. Consumers feel guilt when purchasing non-utilitarian products, and justify hedonic choices by the bundle environment and possible benefits of the integrated functionality. The article details two studies: the first defines the environmental perceptions of technology products and consumer preference, and the second analyses how consumers choose their technologies based on brand, price, and hedonic'utilitarian attributes. The study finds that hedonic and social values increase consumers' preference when characteristics increase in devices (bundle preference), while consumers justify their intention to consume related to features they already have. Social values and sense of guilt motivate consumers to justify their choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Emílio José Montero Arruda-Filho & Silvia Biffignandi, 2016. "Utilitarian characteristics reducing guilt: perceived values in the justification of choice," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 168-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:168-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76423
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:168-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=18 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.