IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v2y2007i1p4-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Hard' is 'soft': exploring the dangers of the 'hard'/'soft' distinction

Author

Listed:
  • Darren McCabe

Abstract

This paper argues that the hard/soft distinction used in relation to new management interventions is potentially dangerous because it serves to reproduce the status quo by reinforcing taken-for-granted assumptions about the world. Thus considering innovations to be 'hard' can result in a failure to think through the social implications of one's actions. It is suggested that our understanding of organisations can be enhanced through reflecting on the dichotomy and its underlying assumptions. It is thought that through such reflection, the number of innovations that are instigated with little thought for employees and their Quality of Working Life can be reduced, even though asymmetrical power relations are likely to remain. These issues are explored by drawing on some qualitative research from a company that introduced Statistical Process Control (SPC), which has been described as a 'hard' intervention, in conjunction with Total Quality Management (TQM).

Suggested Citation

  • Darren McCabe, 2007. "'Hard' is 'soft': exploring the dangers of the 'hard'/'soft' distinction," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 4-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:2:y:2007:i:1:p:4-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=13878
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:2:y:2007:i:1:p:4-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.