IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijimad/v17y2022i1-2p20-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of generational differences in advertising behaviour and fake news perception among Facebook users

Author

Listed:
  • Sunil Hazari

Abstract

Facebook is the largest social media platform that is used by all generations of users, as well as small and large businesses. Many users consider Facebook as a primary news source even though the news on Facebook is not authenticated. This 'fake news' can be used for financial or political gain and can also impact consumer behaviour towards products. The purpose of this study was to investigate advertising response behaviour and fake news perception among multi-generational Facebook users, in conjunction with other variables such as gender. Using a survey, data were collected from a multi-stage quota sample of 400 respondents in the USA. A scale was developed and psychometrically tested as part of the study to determine fake news perception. Findings of this study showed that the frequency of Facebook use was consistent among generations, with Baby Boomers being most active in reading posts, and Gen Y users being most active in posting to Facebook. Gen Y users found Facebook advertisements to be most relevant. Results can be used to drive engagement with Facebook users and develop campaigns that use actionable segmentation schemes. Implications of fake news perception are discussed, and future research directions are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunil Hazari, 2022. "Investigation of generational differences in advertising behaviour and fake news perception among Facebook users," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1/2), pages 20-47.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:17:y:2022:i:1/2:p:20-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijimad:v:17:y:2022:i:1/2:p:20-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=84 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.