IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v9y2020i4p336-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structured approach to the governance of ethics using the five lines of assurance model

Author

Listed:
  • Vida Botes
  • Umesh Sharma
  • Ronald Botes
  • Mandeep Singh

Abstract

Across the globe, the corporate world has once again been shaken by the Steinhoff Corporate Scandal, which affected millions of people as the Steinhoff Corporation operated in various countries, including Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Once again, the media and the public questioned the absence of organisational ethics. The growth and influence of the multi-billion-dollar organisation has drawn increased media coverage and exposed the lack of business ethics within organisations. This paper reviews the key roles and responsibilities of specific stakeholders in relation to ethical conduct. It deliberates on a combined assurance effort and offers the structure for a comprehensive implementation of organisational ethics. The paper is a multi-disciplined literature study and argues that scant attention has been paid to the development of a framework to facilitate an ethical culture. The paper uses the 'five lines of assurance framework' to illustrate the distinct roles of the various internal and external role players to provide a structured approach to the governance of ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Vida Botes & Umesh Sharma & Ronald Botes & Mandeep Singh, 2020. "A structured approach to the governance of ethics using the five lines of assurance model," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 336-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:336-352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:336-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.