IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijdsci/v9y2024i1p19-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research into a risk assessment model for online public opinions based on big data: random forest and logistic model

Author

Listed:
  • Danhui Dong

Abstract

The current risk assessment index system for online public opinions has some deficiencies; therefore, the risk assessment method for online public opinions has some disadvantages. In order to overcome these disadvantages, this research attempts to propose a risk assessment model for online public opinions based on a random forest and logistic model, and then the risks of online public opinions can be evaluated effectively. With the incident of "patient relatives purposefully hurting doctors at Beijing Civil Aviation General Hospital" as the research object, a systematic analysis was conducted in this research on the model indexes. The critical risk indexes of online public opinions are confirmed; sensitivity, reporting speed, reporting frequency, emotional tendency, satisfaction, and timeliness of the processing process are the main factors affecting the risk of online public opinions. The results can provide practical reference for the development trend and risk assessment of online public opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • Danhui Dong, 2024. "Research into a risk assessment model for online public opinions based on big data: random forest and logistic model," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 19-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:19-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135966
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijdsci:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:19-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=429 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.