IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcrac/v11y2020i5p391-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate governance indicators as determinants of bank efficiency: the case of the UK listed banks

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas G. Georgantopoulos
  • Nikolaos Eriotis
  • Ioannis Chasiotis

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of a variety of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of banks listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE), by utilising data collected for 52 banking institutions for the period 2012 to 2017. Exhaustive results derived from multi-model applications document the superiority of GMM models to examine these relationships. Based on robust empirical findings, we support that increasing board size, especially the number of non-executive directors, and the frequency of board meetings up to a certain point could prove to be beneficial for the listed banks on the LSE. Moreover, our findings imply that simply complying with the governance code including independent board members or following the trend of gender diversity without proper evaluation of executives' skills could damage bank efficiency. Finally, this study fails to discern significant links between the number of foreign directors and CEO-Chairman duality with the performance of the UK banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas G. Georgantopoulos & Nikolaos Eriotis & Ioannis Chasiotis, 2020. "Corporate governance indicators as determinants of bank efficiency: the case of the UK listed banks," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 391-416.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:11:y:2020:i:5:p:391-416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=111566
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:11:y:2020:i:5:p:391-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=328 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.