IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v25y2017i3p352-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in information system for exploratory and exploitative processes of innovation and UDR/USR type of innovators

Author

Listed:
  • Vinay Singh
  • R.R.K. Sharma
  • Thanos Papadopoulos
  • Rameshwar Dubey

Abstract

Literature on innovation suggests that innovative business units seem to be information intensive and ambidextrous in nature. Some business units carry out exploratory and exploitative processes under different roof (UDR) and others under same roof (USR). To establish the balance between exploration and exploitation in innovators, information system (IS) plays an important role to share the information accurately, timely, effectively and efficiently. The present study explores three aspects of information sharing: 1) differences in focus (clear vs. unclear orientation) of IS in UDR and USR type of innovative business units; 2) difference in characteristics of IS facilitating exploratory activities v/s exploitative activities considering: a) type of information being used; b) its flexibility; c) business processes characteristics as mapped on IS. The study framework is set in the form of nine hypotheses and verified through primary data obtained from 31 Innovators (15 UDR and 16 USR types) through a structured questionnaire. The majority of the hypotheses are supported. The study contributes to the IS literature in that it underlines the flexibility dimensions of IS to cope-up with the rigor of innovation activities and fragile innovation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinay Singh & R.R.K. Sharma & Thanos Papadopoulos & Rameshwar Dubey, 2017. "Differences in information system for exploratory and exploitative processes of innovation and UDR/USR type of innovators," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(3), pages 352-372.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:352-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:352-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.