IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v19y2024i2p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling the Good and Evil of Organisational Power: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Ricciardelli
  • Nicola Capolupo
  • Paola Adinolfi
  • Gianluigi Mangia

Abstract

This research seeks to investigate the “relational side’s role” of Organisational Power in mitigating that of the “role power” in private firms under the lens of gender dynamics. Employing a sample of service firm workers, a regression analysis is conducted to investigate the role of Reference and Experience, framed as Personal Power because of their relational nature, in mitigating the impact of Coercive power (Positional Power) and the gender-based dynamics occurring between them. From a theoretical standpoint, this study represents an encouraging update on organisational power studies, focusing on the way different forms of power impact and coexist with each other. Furthermore, the originality of this work lies in the will of framing power relationality - understood as personal power - to overcome the exercise of power as a form derived from the role supervisors. Lastly, to contribute to gender studies on the role and predisposition of women to have a perhaps natural predisposition for forms of coercion, as they are more sensitive to relationality and to establish bonds that produce, among their superiors, forms of positive power.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Ricciardelli & Nicola Capolupo & Paola Adinolfi & Gianluigi Mangia, 2024. "Unveiling the Good and Evil of Organisational Power: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(2), pages 1-1, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/49780/53807
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/49780
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Green & Yanyun Yang, 2009. "Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 155-167, March.
    2. Joanne Martin, 1990. "Deconstructing Organizational Taboos: The Suppression of Gender Conflict in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 339-359, November.
    3. Sean M. Handley & Jurriaan de Jong & W. C. Benton, 2019. "How Service Provider Dependence Perceptions Moderate the Power–Opportunism Relationship with Professional Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1692-1715, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Aline Lopes Moreira & Jorge Castellá Sarriera & Leonardo Fernandes Martins & Lívia Maria Bedin & Maria Angela Mattar Yunes & Luciana Cassarino Perez & Murilo Ricardo Zibetti, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of Children’s Subjective Well-Being Scales: a Multigroup Study Investigating School Type, Gender, Age and Region of Children in the South and Southeast Regions of Brazil," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(2), pages 657-679, April.
    3. Calvin Morrill, 2008. "Culture and Organization Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 619(1), pages 15-40, September.
    4. Miguel Ángel López-Sáez & Ariadna Angulo-Brunet & R. Lucas Platero & Oscar Lecuona, 2022. "The Adaptation and Validation of the Trans Attitudes and Beliefs Scale to the Spanish Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Hanne Søberg Finbråten & Peter Nowak & Robert Griebler & Éva Bíró & Mitja Vrdelja & Rana Charafeddine & Lennert Griese & Henrik Bøggild & Doris Schaeffer & Thomas Link & Zdenek Kucera & Julien Mancini, 2022. "The HLS 19 -COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Liu, Gordon & Aroean, Lukman & Ko, Wai Wai, 2023. "Service innovation in business ecosystem: The roles of shared goals, coopetition, and interfirm power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Maura McAdam & Richard T. Harrison & Claire M. Leitch, 2019. "Stories from the field: women’s networking as gender capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 459-474, August.
    8. Fengying Hu & Zhenglong Zhou, 2022. "Monopoly or competition: strategic analysis of a retailing technology service provision," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1651-1689, December.
    9. Borja Costa-López & Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo & Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez & Monika Baryła-Matejczuk & Rosario Ferrer-Cascales, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale: The Parent Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Mikko Ketokivi & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2020. "Transaction Cost Economics As a Theory of Supply Chain Efficiency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1011-1031, April.
    11. Niveen Mazen Alsayyed & Julian Randall, 2023. "Feminist Emergence in a Traditionally Male Industry: Case from Jordan—The Jordanian Banking Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "Reliability Beyond Theory and Into Practice," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 169-173, March.
    13. Corinne Bendersky & Kathleen L. McGinn, 2010. "Perspective---Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 781-797, June.
    14. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. César Merino-Soto & Manuel Fernández-Arata & Jaime Fuentes-Balderrama & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Research Perceived Competency Scale: A New Psychometric Adaptation for University Students’ Research Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Sarah Kaplan, 2018. "Gender and Organization Science: Introduction to a Virtual Special Issue," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1229-1236, December.
    17. José-Carlos García-Rosell, 2019. "A Discursive Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility Education: A Story Co-creation Exercise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1019-1032, February.
    18. Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Helene Ahl, 2006. "Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(5), pages 595-621, September.
    20. Lindsey W. Vilca & Evelyn L. Chambi-Mamani & Emely D. Quispe-Kana & Mónica Hernández-López & Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, 2022. "Functioning of the EROS-R Scale in a Clinical Sample of Psychiatric Patients: New Psychometric Evidence from the Classical Test Theory and the Item Response Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.