IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecosoc/v15y2014i2p76-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surface Modernities: Open-Air Markets, Containment and Verticality in Two Border Towns of Russia and China

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Bille

    (Department of Anthropology, University of Cambridge)

Abstract

This article focuses on the contrasting urbanisms that characterize the two cities of Heihe and Blagoveshchensk on the Sino-Russian border. Since 1990, with the bulk of international trade taking place on the Chinese side, Heihe has rapidly developed into a modern town; by contrast, Blagoveshchensk appears sedate and almost stagnant. Another stark contrast between the two cities is in the ways in which ideas of modernity are spatialized through their urban practices, with Blagoveshchensk demonstrating a preference for horizontal functionalism while Heihe largely follows the iconic and vertical model found in the megacities of the Chinese south. Foregrounding this very spatial imbalance, the paper argues that the Russian association between horizontality and modernity unwittingly collapses Heihe’s riverfront skyline into a smooth surface lacking depth, and renders invisible those economic drivers that operate below this surface as well as along a vertical axis. As a result of this, spatiality provides an initial cultural grid through which the development, success and modernity of the Other is assessed. The methodology followed in this article is primarily anthropological. The research was carried out in October and November2011. A dozen semi-structured and open-ended interviews were conducted with informants of diverse ages and social backgrounds, including businessmen and women, academics, young professionals and students. This research was funded through a grant by the Newton Trust (Cambridge, UK).

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Bille, 2014. "Surface Modernities: Open-Air Markets, Containment and Verticality in Two Border Towns of Russia and China," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 76-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:76-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecsoc.hse.ru/en/2014-15-2.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sino-Russian border; urbanism; space; verticality; trade; open-air markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:76-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zoya Kotelnikova or Zoya Kotelnikova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.