IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3707-d1385278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on a New Soundscape Evaluation Method Suitable for Scenic Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu

    (School of Art, Northwest University, Xi’an 710060, China)

  • Ziyan Dan

    (School of Art, Northwest University, Xi’an 710060, China)

  • Zengfeng Yan

    (School of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

Existing studies have focused mainly on the environmental quality of scenic spots, such as sufficient oxygen content in the air and a high concentration of negative oxygen ions. The perceptions of soundscape in scenic areas are generally good, but there are few reports on the quantitative evaluation of soundscape quality in scenic areas. In this study, we analysed existing methods for evaluating the soundscape of a landscape, evaluated the soundscape comfort of scenic spots, analysed and refined the natural environmental factors affecting the soundscape, and proposed for the first time to use physical environmental indicators such as the air temperature difference, relative humidity, natural illuminance ratio and wind speed as environmental evaluation variables. A quantitative method was used to calculate the soundscape comfort index (SSI) of the landscape. The physical environmental indicators related to famous scenic spots in China, namely, Qingcheng mountain field testing and a subjective soundscape of tourist satisfaction survey, were used to calculate the corresponding soundscape comfort index values, and a quantitative analysis of soundscape comfort and differences in temperature, relative humidity, the illumination ratio, and the correlation between the equivalent sound level A was performed. The measured values of the temperature difference and light ratio were significantly correlated with the soundscape comfort index. The distribution of sound landscape comfort was given by a GIS map, and soundscape comfort was evaluated scientifically. The correlations between soundscape comfort and landscape patch number (PN), landscape patch density (PD), diversity index (Shannon), and landscape shape index (LSI) were quantitatively analysed, which confirmed that the perception of soundscape comfort was affected by landscape space to different degrees. This study has scientific significance and application value for the soundscape evaluation of scenic areas and has significance for soundscape evaluation and design strategies for urban landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Ziyan Dan & Zengfeng Yan, 2024. "Research on a New Soundscape Evaluation Method Suitable for Scenic Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3707-:d:1385278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joo-Young Hong & Keng Hua Chong, 2023. "Designing Public Soundscapes through Social Architecture and Soundscape Approaches: Reflective Review of Architectural Design Studio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Ali Hosseini & Leila Kowkabi, 2023. "Measuring the Soundscape Quality in Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Historic Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Lili Tian & Daniel Winterbottom & Juanjuan Liu, 2023. "Soundscape Optimization Strategies Based on Landscape Elements in Urban Parks: A Case Study of Greenlake Park in Kunming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3707-:d:1385278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.