IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14428-d1252512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyan Li

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jianmei Gao

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lanqing Ge

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Weina Hu

    (School of Foreign Languages for Business, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Qi Ban

    (School of Finance, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Do geographical indication products help facilitate the development of the agricultural economy? This problem is a point of controversy in the field of global agricultural intellectual property. For a long time, there have been different viewpoints on this problem; that is, there is a positive correlation, negative correlation, U-shape correlation, or no correlation between the geographical indication products and the development of the agricultural economy in the context of different studies. To clarify the influence mechanism between the two and explain why there are these disputes, this study used the meta-analysis method to statistically reanalyze 405 observation values provided in 64 independent research samples from the context of different regions around the world. The study results show that geographical indications not only generate more economic benefits than ordinary products but also contribute to the growth of the agricultural economy by effectively promoting the development of agricultural product trade and the enhancement of agricultural product price. There exists a low positive correlation between the geographical indication products and the agricultural economy (r = 0.176, 95% CI = [0.126, 0.225]). In addition, the promotion effect of geographical indication products on the agricultural economy is regulated by the country of origin of the samples, sample level, publication journal, data type, data acquisition approach, and research method. Our research findings further revealed the internal relationship mechanism between the geographical indication products and the agricultural economy and lay a foundation for better protecting and developing geographical indication products.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyan Li & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Weina Hu & Qi Ban, 2023. "Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14428-:d:1252512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14428/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14428/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐Sauveur Ay, 2021. "The Informational Content of Geographical Indications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 523-542, March.
    2. Loïc Henry, 2023. "Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1088-1115, August.
    3. Hüseyin Pamukçu & Ömer Saraç & Sercan Aytuğar & Mustafa Sandıkçı, 2021. "The Effects of Local Food and Local Products with Geographical Indication on the Development of Tourism Gastronomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Leufkens, Daniel, 2017. "EU’s Regulation of Geographical Indications and their Effects on Trade Flows," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(4), December.
    5. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    6. Peter Slade & Jeffrey D. Michler & Anna Josephson, 2019. "Foreign Geographical Indications, Consumer Preferences, and the Domestic Market for Cheese," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 370-390, September.
    7. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Thomas Chaney, 2008. "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03579844, HAL.
    9. Catherine Haeck & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "The Value of Terroir: A Historical Analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne Geographical Indications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 598-619, December.
    10. Durand, Claire & Fournier, Stéphane, 2017. "Can Geographical Indications Modernize Indonesian and Vietnamese Agriculture? Analyzing the Role of National and Local Governments and Producers’ Strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 93-104.
    11. Thomas Chaney, 2008. "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1707-1721, September.
    12. Hongkai Qie & Yudie Chao & Hui Chen & Fan Zhang, 2023. "Do geographical indications of agricultural products promote county-level economic growth?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 666-681, June.
    13. Claire Durand & Stéphane Fournier, 2017. "Can geographical indications modernize Indonesian and Vietnamese agriculture? Analyzing the role of national and local governments and producers’ strategies," Post-Print hal-01651307, HAL.
    14. Sihui Zhang & Yong Sun & Xuzhou Yu & Yafeng Zhang, 2023. "Geographical Indication, Agricultural Products Export and Urban–Rural Income Gap," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Alexandra-Ioana Glogovețan & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Mariantonietta Fiore & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2022. "Consumer Perception and Understanding of European Union Quality Schemes: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6apm7lruv088iagm4rv2c33jtg is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Thomas Chaney, 2008. "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade," SciencePo Working papers hal-03579844, HAL.
    18. Thomas Chaney, 2008. "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade," Post-Print hal-03579844, HAL.
    19. T. D. Stanley, 2001. "Wheat from Chaff: Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 131-150, Summer.
    20. Hui Wen & Sagheer Abbas, 2022. "The Relationship between Symbolic Agricultural Products and Agricultural Economic Development Based on Numerical Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiyan Ma & Guanghua Qiao, 2024. "Can Creating an Agro-Product Regional Public Brand Improve the Ability of Farmers to Sustainably Increase Their Revenue?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphaël Chiappini & Cyrielle Gaglio, 2024. "Digital intensity, trade costs and exports' quality upgrading," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 709-747, February.
    2. Rouzet, Dorothée & Benz, Sebastian & Spinelli, Francesca, 2017. "Trading Firms and Trading Costs in Services: Firm-Level Analysis," Conference papers 332911, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    4. Banri Ito & Katsunori Shirai, 2023. "Patent law harmonization and international trade," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-306, February.
    5. Bolatto, Stefano & Moramarco, Graziano, 2023. "Gains from trade and their quantification: Does sectoral disaggregation matter?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 44-68.
    6. Nicolas Berman & Philippe Martin & Thierry Mayer, 2009. "How do Different Exporters React to Exchange Rate Changes? Theory, Empirics and Aggregate Implications," Working Papers 2009-32, CEPII research center.
    7. Bing Li & Linyue Li & Rou Li & Yunsong Yue, 2023. "Internet and firms’ exports and imports: Firm level evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 835-872, March.
    8. Ha, Jongrim & Marc Stocker, M. & Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2020. "Inflation and exchange rate pass-through," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Mathias Bühler, 2023. "Trade and Regional Economic Development," CESifo Working Paper Series 10270, CESifo.
    10. Karingi, Stephen N. & Leyaro, Vincent, 2010. "Surmounting Africa's Trade Capacity Contraints: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Aid for Trade," Conference papers 331966, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Nasreen Nawaz, 2022. "A Dynamic Optimal Trade Facilitation Policy," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 102-122, March.
    12. Benz, Sebastian & Jaax, Alexander, 2019. "Quantifying the costs of regulatory barriers to trade in services: New estimates of ad valorem equivalents based on the OECD STRI," Conference papers 333096, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Francois de Soyres & Erik Frohm & Emily Highkin & Carter Mix, 2021. "Forward Looking Exporters," FEDS Notes 2021-10-06-1, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    14. Nicholas Sheard, 2014. "Learning to Export and the Timing of Entry to Export Markets," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 536-560, August.
    15. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Ito, Keiko & Fukao, Kyoji & Deseatnicov, Ivan, 2023. "The impact of the strengthening of export controls on Japanese exports of dual-use goods," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 160-179.
    16. Lee, Woori & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2023. "Third-country effects of regional trade agreements: A firm-level analysis," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Bekkers, Eddy, 2013. "Estimating Trade Elasticities and Asymmetric Trade Costs under Firm Heterogeneity," Conference papers 332379, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Sergey G. Kokovin & Shamil Sharapudinov & Alexander Tarasov & Philip Ushchev, 2020. "A Theory of Monopolistic Competition with Horizontally Heterogeneous Consumers," CESifo Working Paper Series 8082, CESifo.
    19. Defever, Fabrice & Riaño, Alejandro, 2022. "Firm-destination heterogeneity and the distribution of export intensity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2011. "Gravity, market potential and economic development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 281-294, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14428-:d:1252512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.