IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8386-d858623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Relational Dynamics of Chilean Rural Teachers: Contributions from a Narrative-Generative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Sandoval-Obando

    (Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile)

  • Nicolás Pareja Arellano

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Arturo Prat, Victoria 4721189, Chile)

  • Ángel Acevedo-Duque

    (Programa Doctorado Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile)

  • Hernán Riquelme-Brevis

    (Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile)

  • Claudio Hernández-Mosqueira

    (Departamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile)

  • Johan Rivas-Valenzuela

    (Departamento de Didáctica de la Expresión Musical, Plástica y Corporal, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

The rural teaching profession demands a genuine commitment to the development of future generations, ensuring a legacy that transcends time. Thus, generativity would be a characteristic dimension of the teaching function manifested in various forms, roles and tasks aimed at caring for students and their communities of origin. Objective: To explore the relational dynamics that rural teachers have constructed throughout their life trajectories and how these have influenced the potentially generative development of their teaching identity. Method: an interpretative-qualitative approach was adopted, following a descriptive, exploratory and cross-sectional design. The purposive sample consisted of twelve teachers with an average of 33 years of experience in rural schools in the Metropolitan Region, La Araucanía and Los Ríos (Chile). In-depth interviews from a narrative-generative perspective were used to collect the data. Subsequently, the stories were subjected to content analysis, following the logic of Grounded Theory. Results: The teachers show a potentially generative development, expressed in the construction of relational dynamics of trust, reciprocity and positive affection with their students. With their peers, they demonstrate collaborative practices, teamwork and orientation towards continuous improvement in their professional work. At the management level, they stand out for their leadership skills and commitment to the development of rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Sandoval-Obando & Nicolás Pareja Arellano & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Hernán Riquelme-Brevis & Claudio Hernández-Mosqueira & Johan Rivas-Valenzuela, 2022. "Understanding the Relational Dynamics of Chilean Rural Teachers: Contributions from a Narrative-Generative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8386-:d:858623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Jiménez-Bucarey & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Luis Aguilar-Gallardo & Miguel Mora-Moscoso & Elena Cachicatari Vargas, 2021. "Student’s Satisfaction of the Quality of Online Learning in Higher Education: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Rosa Pilar Esteve-Faubel & Alba Oller-Benitez & María Pilar Aparicio-Flores, 2020. "Perceptions of Future Teachers of Audiovisual Education and Communication. Challenges in Training for a Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Daniel Müller & Sander Renes, 2021. "Fairness views and political preferences: evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 679-711, May.
    4. Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Emilio Abad-Segura & Eloy López-Meneses & José Gómez-Galán, 2020. "Managing ICT for Sustainable Education: Research Analysis in the Context of Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Jessica Müller & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller & Prateek Kalia & Khalid Mehmood, 2021. "Predictive Sustainability Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior Incorporating Ecological Conscience and Moral Obligation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Jiménez-Bucarey & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Luis Aguilar-Gallardo & Miguel Mora-Moscoso & Elena Cachicatari Vargas, 2021. "Student’s Satisfaction of the Quality of Online Learning in Higher Education: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Viviana Marin Chaves & Paula Andrea Mejía Henao & Juan Carlos Olaya Molano, 2022. "Purchase Intention and Satisfaction of Online Shop Users in Developing Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Carmen Jiménez-Bucarey & Tohtli Prado-Sabido & Mirtha Mercedes Fernández-Mantilla & Irene Merino-Flores & Sandra Sofía Izquierdo-Marín & Nicolás Valle-Palomino, 2023. "Education for Sustainable Development: Challenges for Postgraduate Programmes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Cabeza Martínez, Begoña, 2023. "Social preferences, support for redistribution, and attitudes towards vulnerable groups," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Jan Fazlagić & Windham Loopesko, 2021. "A Conceptual Model for Developing Climate Education in Sustainability Management Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Eugénia de Matos Pedro & João Leitão & Helena Alves, 2021. "HEI Efficiency and Quality of Life: Seeding the Pro-Sustainability Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Syed Mohsin Saif & Syed Immamul Ansarullah & Mohamed Tahar Ben Othman & Sami Alshmrany & Muhammad Shafiq & Habib Hamam, 2022. "Impact of ICT in Modernizing the Global Education Industry to Yield Better Academic Outreach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Belguise, Margot & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2023. "Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2308, CEPREMAP.
    9. Monica Ioana Burcă-Voicu & Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Teaching Format Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation on an Emerging Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Bol, Damien & Blais, André & Coulombe, Maxime & Laslier, Jean-François & Pilet, Jean-Benoit, 2023. "Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Gonzalo R. Llanos-Herrera & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Selene Simón-Isidoro & Agustín Pablo Álvarez-Herranz & Rina Álvarez-Becerra & Lisette C. Sánchez Díaz, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Hiking Tourism and Its Relevance for Wellbeing and Knowledge Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Fehr Ernst & Epper Thomas & Senn Julien, 2020. "Social preferences and redistributive politics," ECON - Working Papers 339, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2023.
    13. Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu & Viorel Robu & Tatiana Dobrescu & Carlos Hervás-Gómez & Ionuț Viorel Stoica, 2021. "Students’ Attitude towards the Sustainable Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Annchen Mielmann, 2021. "Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Cohn, Alain & Jessen, Lasse J. & Klašnja, Marko & Smeets, Paul, 2023. "Wealthy Americans and redistribution: The role of fairness preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. José Luis Martín-Núñez & Juan Luis Bravo-Ramos & Susana Sastre-Merino & Iciar Pablo-Lerchundi & Arturo Caravantes Redondo & Cristina Núñez-del-Río, 2022. "Teaching in Secondary Education Teacher Training with a Hybrid Model: Students’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:932-949 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Momsen, Katharina & Ohndorf, Markus, 2023. "Information avoidance: Self-image concerns, inattention, and ideology," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 386-400.
    19. Begoña Cabeza;, 2023. "Social preferences, support for redistribution, and attitudes towards vulnerable groups," Working Papers 2308, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    20. Dorin, Camille & Hainguerlot, Marine & Huber-Yahi, Hélène & Vergnaud, Jean-Christophe & de Gardelle, Vincent, 2021. "How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 932-949, July.
    21. Antinyan, Armenak & Baghdasaryan, Vardan & Grigoryan, Aleksandr, 2022. "Charitable giving, social capital, and positional concerns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    generativity; pedagogy; rural school; affectivity; collaboration; SDG4;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8386-:d:858623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.