IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v5y2022i3p45-783d886968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neutrosophic F-Test for Two Counts of Data from the Poisson Distribution with Application in Climatology

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Aslam

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21551, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This paper addresses the modification of the F-test for count data following the Poisson distribution. The F-test when the count data are expressed in intervals is considered in this paper. The proposed F-test is evaluated using real data from climatology. The comparative study showed the efficiency of the F-test for count data under neutrosophic statistics over the F-test for count data under classical statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Aslam, 2022. "Neutrosophic F-Test for Two Counts of Data from the Poisson Distribution with Application in Climatology," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:3:p:45-783:d:886968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/3/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/3/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & Osorio-Gómez, Gilberto, 2018. "Wind turbine selection method based on the statistical analysis of nominal specifications for estimating the cost of energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 980-998.
    2. Lo Brano, Valerio & Orioli, Aldo & Ciulla, Giuseppina & Culotta, Simona, 2011. "Quality of wind speed fitting distributions for the urban area of Palermo, Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1026-1039.
    3. Viertl, Reinhard, 2006. "Univariate statistical analysis with fuzzy data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 133-147, November.
    4. Dankmar Böhning & Patarawan Sangnawakij, 2021. "Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 75-85, March.
    5. P. Filzmoser & R. Viertl, 2004. "Testing hypotheses with fuzzy data: The fuzzy p-value," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 21-29, February.
    6. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.
    7. Ali, Sajid & Lee, Sang-Moon & Jang, Choon-Man, 2018. "Statistical analysis of wind characteristics using Weibull and Rayleigh distributions in Deokjeok-do Island – Incheon, South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 652-663.
    8. Puig, Pedro & Weiß, Christian H., 2020. "Some goodness-of-fit tests for the Poisson distribution with applications in Biodosimetry," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guedes, Kevin S. & de Andrade, Carla F. & Rocha, Paulo A.C. & Mangueira, Rivanilso dos S. & de Moura, Elineudo P., 2020. "Performance analysis of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in estimating the parameters of several wind speed distributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2012. "Testing fuzzy hypotheses based on vague observations: a p-value approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 469-484, May.
    3. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2019. "Wind speed distribution selection – A review of recent development and progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Zheng, Hanbo & Huang, Wufeng & Zhao, Junhui & Liu, Jiefeng & Zhang, Yiyi & Shi, Zhen & Zhang, Chaohai, 2022. "A novel falling model for wind speed probability distribution of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 91-99.
    5. Xiao, Qing & Zhou, Shaowu, 2018. "Probabilistic power flow computation considering correlated wind speeds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 677-685.
    6. Niu, Tong & Wang, Jianzhou & Zhang, Kequan & Du, Pei, 2018. "Multi-step-ahead wind speed forecasting based on optimal feature selection and a modified bat algorithm with the cognition strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 213-229.
    7. Muhammad Umar Afzaal & Intisar Ali Sajjad & Ahmed Bilal Awan & Kashif Nisar Paracha & Muhammad Faisal Nadeem Khan & Abdul Rauf Bhatti & Muhammad Zubair & Waqas ur Rehman & Salman Amin & Shaikh Saaqib , 2020. "Probabilistic Generation Model of Solar Irradiance for Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems Using Weibull Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Ismail Kamdar & Shahid Ali & Juntakan Taweekun & Hafiz Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Zhang, Yagang & Zhao, Yunpeng & Shen, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Jinghui, 2022. "A comprehensive wind speed prediction system based on Monte Carlo and artificial intelligence algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    11. Fang, Xin & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Du, Ershun & Zhang, Ning & Li, Fangxing, 2018. "Modelling wind power spatial-temporal correlation in multi-interval optimal power flow: A sparse correlation matrix approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 531-539.
    12. Kantar, Yeliz Mert & Usta, Ilhan & Arik, Ibrahim & Yenilmez, Ismail, 2018. "Wind speed analysis using the Extended Generalized Lindley Distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1024-1030.
    13. Noyes, Carlos & Loth, Eric & Martin, Dana & Johnson, Kathryn & Ananda, Gavin & Selig, Michael, 2020. "Extreme-scale load-aligning rotor: To hinge or not to hinge?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Zárate-Miñano, Rafael & Anghel, Marian & Milano, Federico, 2013. "Continuous wind speed models based on stochastic differential equations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 42-49.
    15. Valerio Lo Brano & Giuseppina Ciulla & Antonio Piacentino & Fabio Cardona, 2013. "On the Efficacy of PCM to Shave Peak Temperature of Crystalline Photovoltaic Panels: An FDM Model and Field Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Longfu Luo & Xiaofeng Zhang & Dongran Song & Weiyi Tang & Jian Yang & Li Li & Xiaoyu Tian & Wu Wen, 2018. "Optimal Design of Rated Wind Speed and Rotor Radius to Minimizing the Cost of Energy for Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Upma Singh & Mohammad Rizwan & Hasmat Malik & Fausto Pedro García Márquez, 2022. "Wind Energy Scenario, Success and Initiatives towards Renewable Energy in India—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-39, March.
    19. Soukissian, Takvor H. & Karathanasi, Flora E., 2017. "On the selection of bivariate parametric models for wind data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 280-304.
    20. Jianxing Yu & Yiqin Fu & Yang Yu & Shibo Wu & Yuanda Wu & Minjie You & Shuai Guo & Mu Li, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Bohai Bay, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:3:p:45-783:d:886968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.