IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i16p1983-d617433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Multi-Objective Duopoly Game with Capital Accumulation and Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Bertrand Crettez

    (Department of Economics, Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris II & CRED, EA 7321, 21 Rue Valette, 75005 Paris, France)

  • Naila Hayek

    (Department of Economics, Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris II & CRED, EA 7321, 21 Rue Valette, 75005 Paris, France)

  • Peter M. Kort

    (Department of Econometrics and Operations Research & Center, Tilburg University, LE 5000 Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper studies a discrete-time dynamic duopoly game with homogenous goods. Both firms have to decide on investment where investment increases production capacity so that they are able to put a larger quantity on the market. The downside, however, is that a larger quantity raises pollution. The firms have multiple objectives in the sense that each one maximizes the discounted profit stream and appreciates a clean environment as well. We obtain some surprising results. First, where it is known from the continuous-time differential game literature that firms invest more under a feedback information structure compared to an open-loop one, we detect scenarios where the opposite holds. Second, in a feedback Nash equilibrium, capital stock is more sensitive to environmental appreciation than in the open-loop case.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek & Peter M. Kort, 2021. "A Dynamic Multi-Objective Duopoly Game with Capital Accumulation and Pollution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-34, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1983-:d:617433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wly:soecon:v:83:1:y:2016:p:236-252 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. L. Lambertini & A. Palestini & A. Tampieri, 2014. "CSR in an Asymmetric Duopoly with Environmental Externalities," Working Papers wp959, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    3. Feichtinger, Gustav & Lambertini, Luca & Leitmann, George & Wrzaczek, Stefan, 2016. "R&D for green technologies in a dynamic oligopoly: Schumpeter, arrow and inverted-U’s," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1131-1138.
    4. Luca Lambertini & Arsen Palestini & Alessandro Tampieri, 2016. "CSR in an Asymmetric Duopoly with Environmental Externality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 236-252, July.
    5. Kuzyutin, Denis & Smirnova, Nadezhda & Gromova, Ekaterina, 2019. "Long-term implementation of the cooperative solution in a multistage multicriteria game," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    6. Ankan Bhaumik & Sankar Kumar Roy & Gerhard Wilhelm Weber, 2020. "Hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-linguistic term set approach in Prisoners’ dilemma game theory using TOPSIS: a case study on Human-trafficking," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 797-816, June.
    7. Francisco Cabo & Guiomar Martín-Herrán & María Pilar Martínez-García, 2020. "Non-constant Discounting, Social Welfare and Endogenous Growth with Pollution Externalities," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 369-403, July.
    8. Reynolds, Stanley S, 1987. "Capacity Investment, Preemption and Commitment in an Infinite Horizon Model," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 28(1), pages 69-88, February.
    9. Yanase, Akihiko, 2013. "Corporate Environmentalism in Dynamic Oligopoly," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 3(3), pages 223-250, March.
    10. Dawid, Herbert & Kopel, Michael & Kort, Peter M., 2013. "New product introduction and capacity investment by incumbents: Effects of size on strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 133-142.
    11. Anna Rettieva, 2017. "Equilibria in Dynamic Multicriteria Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Lambertini,Luca, 2018. "Differential Games in Industrial Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107164680, November.
    13. Sankar Kumar Roy & Ankan Bhaumik, 2018. "Intelligent Water Management: a Triangular Type-2 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Matrix Games Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 949-968, February.
    14. Bertrand Crettez & Naila Hayek, 2021. "A Dynamic Multi-Objective Duopoly Game with Environmentally Concerned Firms," Post-Print hal-04120429, HAL.
    15. Naila Hayek, 2018. "Infinite-horizon multiobjective optimal control problems for bounded processes," Post-Print hal-04134773, HAL.
    16. Shaojian Qu & Ying Ji, 2016. "The Worst-Case Weighted Multi-Objective Game with an Application to Supply Chain Competitions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Juin-Jen & Chen, Jhy-Hwa & Tsai, Ming-Fang, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, social optimum, and the environment-growth tradeoff," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Kuzyutin, Denis & Smirnova, Nadezhda, 2023. "A dynamic multicriteria game of renewable resource extraction with environmentally concerned players," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Rettieva, 2022. "Dynamic Multicriteria Game with Pollution Externalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Dragone, Davide & Lambertini, Luca & Palestini, Arsen, 2022. "Emission taxation, green innovations and inverted-U aggregate R&D efforts in a linear state differential game," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 62-68.
    3. Gustav Feichtinger & Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort & Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek, 2022. "Asymmetric Information in a Capital Accumulation Differential Game with Spillover and Learning Effects," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 878-895, September.
    4. Feichtinger, Gustav & Lambertini, Luca & Leitmann, George & Wrzaczek, Stefan, 2022. "Managing the tragedy of commons and polluting emissions: A unified view," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 487-499.
    5. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2019. "General analysis of dynamic oligopoly with sticky price," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2990-2998.
    6. Frederick Ploeg & Aart Zeeuw, 1992. "International aspects of pollution control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 117-139, March.
    7. Andrea Caravaggio & Luigi De Cesare & Andrea Di Liddo, 2023. "A Differential Game for Optimal Water Price Management," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Karp, Larry & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 1988. "Dynamic Oligopoly: Estimation and Tests of Market Structure," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt7fk1119n, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    9. Guillermo Caruana & Liran Einav, 2008. "Production targets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 990-1017, December.
    10. Angel Sanchis-Cano & Luis Guijarro & Massimo Condoluci, 2018. "Dynamic capacity provision for wireless sensors’ connectivity: A profit optimization approach," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(4), pages 15501477187, April.
    11. Slade, Margaret E., 1999. "Sticky prices in a dynamic oligopoly: An investigation of (s,S) thresholds," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 477-511, May.
    12. Lamantia, Fabio & Pezzino, Mario & Tramontana, Fabio, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of discontinuous best response with innovation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 120-133.
    13. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the firm revisited with environmental issues," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1421, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Yeung, David W. K., 1996. "A differential game model of a market of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 599-608, May.
    15. Galinato, Gregmar I. & Hyland, Marie & Islam, Asif M., 2022. "Does corporate social responsibility benefit society? Evidence from Latin America," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    16. Caputo, Michael R. & Ling, Chen, 2013. "The intrinsic comparative dynamics of locally differentiable feedback Nash equilibria of autonomous and exponentially discounted infinite horizon differential games," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1982-1994.
    17. Cellini, Roberto & Lambertini, Luca, 2007. "A differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods and sticky prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1131-1144, January.
    18. Vives, Xavier & Jun, Byoung, 2001. "Incentives in Dynamic Duopoly," CEPR Discussion Papers 2899, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Xin, Baogui & Sun, Minghe, 2018. "A differential oligopoly game for optimal production planning and water savings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 206-217.
    20. Bertrand Villeneuve & Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, 2013. "Industry Restructuring: A Case for Affirmative Action," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 109-110, pages 179-201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1983-:d:617433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.