IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i1p37-d1320466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portugal’s Crowdfunding: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Torres

    (NECE-Research Center in Business Sciences, Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Zélia Serrasqueiro

    (CEFAGE-UBI Research Center, Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Márcio Oliveira

    (NECE-Research Center in Business Sciences, Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    School of Education and Social Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and classify the evolution of crowdfunding in Portugal from 2014 to 2020, addressing the central question, “What is the evolution of literature on crowdfunding and its research focuses in Portugal?”. Additionally, it investigates, through the sub-question, if crowdfunding is perceived as an alternative form of financing. The methodology employs a systematic review, covering four thematic areas: (1) research focus—concepts; (2) research method—quantitative/qualitative identification; (3) geographical area—countries of study; (4) innovation—future research areas. The research begins with Google Scholar, followed by a more specific search of the B-On database, focusing on the Portuguese context. Results highlight the scarcity of research in Portugal, emphasizing the nascency of crowdfunding in the country. The study reveals the importance of investor behavior, influenced by platform security and regulations. Growth in crowdfunding in Portugal is anticipated, attracting multidisciplinary interest but emphasizing the need for more comprehensive studies. Despite limitations in data availability, the study provides valuable insights for entrepreneurs seeking alternative financing in Portugal, demonstrating crowdfunding as an alternative financing method. Integration of crowdfunding with technology, especially blockchain, is suggested as a potentially disruptive system, paving the way for future research and innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Torres & Zélia Serrasqueiro & Márcio Oliveira, 2024. "Portugal’s Crowdfunding: A Systematic Literature Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:37-:d:1320466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas J. Cumming & Gaël Leboeuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2020. "Crowdfunding models: Keep‐It‐All vs. All‐Or‐Nothing," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 331-360, June.
    2. Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque, 2019. "Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-70.
    3. Belleflamme, Paul & Omrani, Nessrine & Peitz, Martin, 2015. "The economics of crowdfunding platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 11-28.
    4. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.
    5. Baucus, Melissa S. & Mitteness, Cheryl R., 2016. "Crowdfrauding: Avoiding Ponzi entrepreneurs when investing in new ventures," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 37-50.
    6. Susana Bernardino & J. Freitas Santos, 2020. "Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study on Knowledge, Benefits and Barriers Perceived by Young Potential Entrepreneurs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Liang & Shneor, Rotem & Sun, Zhe, 2022. "Skin in the game: Self-funding and reward crowdfunding success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 89-100.
    2. Sha Zhou & Tao Ma & Zhengchi Liu, 2021. "Crowdfunding as a screener for collective investment," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 195-221, March.
    3. Duan, Yang & Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Entrepreneurs' facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Xin Tang & Haibing Lu & Wei Huang & Shulin Liu, 2023. "Investment decisions and pricing strategies of crowdfunding players: In a two-sided crowdfunding market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1209-1240, June.
    5. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Bingyou Chen & Yu Luo & Jieni Li & Yujian Li & Ying Liu & Fan Yang & Junge Bo & Yanan Qiao, 2023. "Blockchain-based Decentralized Co-governance: Innovations and Solutions for Sustainable Crowdfunding," Papers 2306.00869, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    7. Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu, 2018. "Crowdfunding with overenthusiastic investors : a global game model," Working Papers hal-01718793, HAL.
    8. Peter Konhäusner & Marius Thielmann & Veronica Câmpian & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2021. "Crowdfunding for Independent Print Media: E-Commerce, Marketing, and Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Swati Oberoi & Smita Srivastava & Vishal K. Gupta & Rohit Joshi & Atul Mehta, 2022. "Crowd Reactions to Entrepreneurial Failure in Rewards-Based Crowdfunding: A Psychological Contract Theory Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Chu, Tiankuo & Wei, Xu & Zhou, Yimin, 2021. "The pricing and efficiency of pre-Sale crowdfunding," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    11. Douglas J. Cumming & Gaël Leboeuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2020. "Crowdfunding models: Keep‐It‐All vs. All‐Or‐Nothing," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 331-360, June.
    12. Hans Peter Grüner & Christoph Siemroth, 2019. "Crowdfunding, Efficiency, and Inequality," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(5), pages 1393-1427.
    13. Ellman, Matthew & Hurkens, Sjaak, 2019. "Optimal crowdfunding design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Maja Adena & Steffen Huck, 2022. "Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(5), pages 1399-1417, November.
    15. Kim, Jin-Hyuk & Newberry, Peter & Qiu, Calvin, 2022. "The role of information signals in determining crowdfunding outcomes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 168-181.
    16. Lv, Jiancheng & Bi, Gongbing & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Crowdfunding pricing and quality overstatement in the presence of platform regulation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Xu, Shengshuo & Ling, Liuyi & Du, Shaofu & Liu, Lindong, 2023. "Crowdfunding or traditional mode? Strategy choices in product selling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Amina Rizwan & Faisal Mustafa, 2022. "Fintech Attaining Sustainable Development: An Investor Perspective of Crowdfunding Platforms in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Ivelin Elenchev & Aleksandar Vasilev, 2019. "Forecasting the Success Rate of Reward Based Crowdfunding Projects," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 17(1 (Spring), pages 51-77.
    20. Gary Dushnitsky & Evila Piva & Cristina Rossi‐Lamastra, 2022. "Investigating the mix of strategic choices and performance of transaction platforms: Evidence from the crowdfunding setting," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 563-598, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:37-:d:1320466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.