IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i2p82-d501400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idiosyncratic Viral Loss Theory: Systemic Operational Losses in Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Beckett Velez

    (College of Management and Technology, School of Management, Walden University, 100 Washington, Avenue South, Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA
    Sophia Beckett Velez Ph.D. has worked over 16 years as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with large banks providing consulting services. As a CPA, she worked for firms such as PriceWaterhoCoopers LLP (PwC), where she performed financial audits and attestation services for large banks.)

Abstract

Basel III regulation intent is to increase the resiliency of banks through effective risk management practices that can reduce significant idiosyncratic operational losses. A systemic risk event that leads to significant losses in a bank holding company (BHC) can expose them to become insolvent and cause significant volatility and unpredictable negative impact on the United States economy. The viral spread of operational losses through global markets by interconnected multinational banks can be compared to viruses spread through interconnected countries and the significant losses incurred; this can be referred to as idiosyncratic viral loss theory. This idiosyncratic viral loss theory discusses systemic operational losses that are evident in human error, fraud, and legal expenses that are aligned to systemic operational risk. The occurrences of significant losses that are idiosyncratic in nature and that are linked to failed internal processes, people, systems, and external events are defined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as operational risk losses; these losses’ idiosyncratic nature makes them comparable to viruses. This study employs the Compliance and Ethics Group’s (OCEG’s) standard that integrates governance, risk management, internal control, assurance, and compliance (GRC capability model) into one functional goal to improve quality and principled performance through measurable tools that may enhance effectiveness and efficiency practices. This study concerns senior manager activities that can be effective towards meeting effective risk management practices posed by the Basel III regulation for BHCs, which may reduce the spread of significant losses in the banks. Through the use of a qualitative e-Delphi study, 10 banking finance experts were convened to build consensus on effective risk management practices. Data were collected from three electronic questionnaires submitted through Qualtrics. Data were analyzed using theoretical triangulation, coding, and thematic analysis. Four important considerations were identified that could bolster effective risk management practices: (a) a comprehensive enterprise-wide risk; (b) controlling fraud; (c) going beyond the minimum risk assessment requirements set forth by the banking regulators; (d) independent risk identification and management. These considerations towards effective risk management practices may help reduce systemic operational losses viral spread in banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Beckett Velez, 2021. "Idiosyncratic Viral Loss Theory: Systemic Operational Losses in Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:82-:d:501400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/82/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/82/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia P. Iglesias & Alexander Thompson & Wolf H. Rogowski & Katherine Payne, 2016. "Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(11), pages 1161-1172, November.
    2. Gong, Di & Huizinga, Harry & Laeven, Luc, 2018. "Nonconsolidated affiliates, bank capitalization, and risk taking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 109-129.
    3. Gastón Andrés Giordana & Ingmar Schumacher, 2017. "An Empirical Study on the Impact of Basel III Standards on Banks’ Default Risk: The Case of Luxembourg," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Hale Balseven, 2016. "The Political Economy of Financial Regulation Policies Following the Global Crisis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 607-616.
    5. William C. Handorf, 2017. "Regulatory ratios, CDS spreads, and credit ratings in a favorable economic environment," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 268-285, July.
    6. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani & William W. Lang, 2016. "Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 133-149, June.
    7. Thomas Kaspereit & Kerstin Lopatta & Suren Pakhchanyan & Jörg Prokop, 2017. "Systemic operational risk," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 252-267, May.
    8. Francisco Venegas-Martínez & José Francisco Martínez-Sánchez & María Teresa V. Martínez-Palacios, 2016. "An analysis on operational risk in international banking: A Bayesian approach (2007–2011)," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(140), pages 208-220, September.
    9. Sophia Velez & Michael Neubert & Daphne Halkias, 2020. "Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Kris V Parag & Christl A Donnelly, 2020. "Using information theory to optimise epidemic models for real-time prediction and estimation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Kevin Dowd & Martin Hutchinson, 2016. "Learning the Right Lessons from the Financial Crisis," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 36(2), pages 393-413, Spring/Su.
    12. Larry D. Wall, 2017. "Recent changes in US regulation of large foreign banking organizations," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(3), pages 318-332, July.
    13. Tilo Bellof & Carsten S. Wehn, 2018. "On the Treatment of Model Risk in the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophia Velez & Michael Neubert & Daphne Halkias, 2020. "Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Correa, Ricardo & Goldberg, Linda S., 2022. "Bank complexity, governance, and risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Christian Eckert, 2020. "Risk and risk management of spillover effects: Evidence from the literature," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 75-104, March.
    5. Linda S. Goldberg, 2022. "Global Liquidity: Drivers, Volatility and Toolkits," Speech 95155, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    6. Iryna Yanenkova & Yuliia Nehoda & Svetlana Drobyazko & Andrii Zavhorodnii & Lyudmyla Berezovska, 2021. "Modeling of Bank Credit Risk Management Using the Cost Risk Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Anna Chrysafi & Vili Virkki & Mika Jalava & Vilma Sandström & Johannes Piipponen & Miina Porkka & Steven J. Lade & Kelsey Mere & Lan Wang-Erlandsson & Laura Scherer & Lauren S. Andersen & Elena Bennet, 2022. "Quantifying Earth system interactions for sustainable food production via expert elicitation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 830-842, October.
    8. Nyola, Annick Pamen & Sauviat, Alain & Tarazi, Amine & Danisman, Gamze Ozturk, 2021. "How organizational and geographic complexity influence performance: Evidence from European banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Linda S. Goldberg, 2024. "Global Liquidity: Drivers, Volatility and Toolkits," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 72(1), pages 1-31, March.
    10. Meier, Samira & Rodriguez Gonzalez, Miguel & Kunze, Frederik, 2021. "The global financial crisis, the EMU sovereign debt crisis and international financial regulation: lessons from a systematic literature review," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Giuliana Birindelli & Paola Ferretti & Giovanni Ferri & Marco Savioli, 2022. "Regulatory reform and banking diversity: reassessing Basel 3," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 429-456, December.
    12. Lallour, Antoine & Mio, Hitoshi, 2016. "Do we need a stable funding ratio? Banks’ funding in the global financial crisis," Bank of England working papers 602, Bank of England.
    13. Sebastian Krug & Matthias Lengnick & Hans-Werner Wohltmann, 2014. "The impact of Basel III on financial (in)stability: an agent-based credit network approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 1917-1932, December.
    14. Simona HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA, 2022. "FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox – new challenges for the financial market. The case of the Slovak Republic," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 399-411, October.
    15. Hossein Haji Ali Afzali & Jonathan Karnon & Olga Theou & Justin Beilby & Matteo Cesari & Renuka Visvanathan, 2019. "Structuring a conceptual model for cost-effectiveness analysis of frailty interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Gong, Di & Huizinga, Harry & Li, Tianshi & Zhu, Jigao, 2023. "Goodhart’s law in China: Bank branching regulation and window dressing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Douglas da Rosa München & Herbert Kimura, 2020. "Regulatory Banking Leverage: what do you know?," Working Papers Series 540, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    18. Foly Ananou & Dimitris Chronopoulos & Amine Tarazi & John O S Wilson, 2023. "Liquidity Regulation and Bank Risk," Working Papers hal-03366418, HAL.
    19. Allen, Franklin & Jagtiani, Julapa & Goldstein, Itay, 2018. "The Interplay between Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Alice Morgan & Sally Hartmanis & Emmanuel Tsochatzis & Philip N. Newsome & Stephen D. Ryder & Rachel Elliott & Lefteris Floros & Richard Hall & Victoria Higgins & George Stanley & Sandrine Cure & Shar, 2021. "Disease burden and economic impact of diagnosed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2018," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(4), pages 505-518, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:82-:d:501400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.