IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16258-d993557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence against Chinese Women: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Zhao

    (School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, 15 Feicui Road, Hefei 230601, China
    XiangYa Nursing School, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yuxin Huang

    (Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, XiangYa Hospital of Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mei Sun

    (XiangYa Nursing School, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, China
    XiangYa Center for Evidence-Based Practice & Healthcare Innovation: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Ying Li

    (Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, XiangYa Hospital of Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, China)

  • Lisa L. Lommel

    (School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, San Francisco, CA 94143-0606, USA)

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in China remains high. Understanding associated risk factors will help inform prevention. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify associated risk factors of intimate partner violence against women in mainland China. Methods: Nine English and Chinese databases were searched from 1 August 2008–2 August 2022. Reference lists of relevant studies supplemented the initial results. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence was used to assess article quality. Study results were combined in a narrative synthesis. Results: Nineteen eligible studies were identified. Examples of key intimate partner violence risk factors included: partner’s low education or income, unhealthy habits (gambling), women’s marital status, poor health or education, women’s or partner’s childhood abuse or witnessing thereof at home, or multiple children and husband dominance. Conclusions: Despite the significant changes in Chinese policies and the new law, IPV continues, and this review has highlighted vulnerable women who need identification and protection. Further study is needed of individual (e.g., psychological well-being), relationship/family, and society/cultural variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Zhao & Yuxin Huang & Mei Sun & Ying Li & Lisa L. Lommel, 2022. "Risk Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence against Chinese Women: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16258-:d:993557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Okan Yilmaz, 2018. "Female Autonomy, Social Norms and Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Turkey," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 1321-1337, August.
    2. Dan Anderberg & Helmut Rainer & Jonathan Wadsworth & Tanya Wilson, 2016. "Unemployment and Domestic Violence: Theory and Evidence," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(597), pages 1947-1979, November.
    3. Xuesong He & Daniel Fu Keung Wong, 2013. "A comparison of female migrant workers’ mental health in four cities in China," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(2), pages 114-122, March.
    4. Tertilt Michèle & Berg Gerard J. van den, 2015. "The Association Between Own Unemployment and Violence Victimization Among Female Youths," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(4-5), pages 499-513, August.
    5. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303694_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Yueping Song & Xiao-Yuan Dong, 2017. "Domestic Violence and Women’s Land Rights in Rural China: Findings from a National Survey in 2010," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 1471-1485, September.
    7. Xiao Yan Chen & Camilla K. M. Lo & Ko Ling Chan & Wing Cheong Leung & Patrick Ip, 2022. "Association between Childhood Exposure to Family Violence and Telomere Length: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Peterman, A. & Pereira, A. & Bleck, J. & Palermo, T.M. & Yount, K.M., 2017. "Women's individual asset ownership and experience of intimate partner violence: Evidence from 28 international surveys," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(5), pages 747-755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Turki Alqurashi & Parveen Ali & Sharron Hinchliff, 2023. "Prevalence, Causes and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonia Bhalotra & Uma Kambhampati & Samantha Rawlings & Zahra Siddique, 2021. "Intimate Partner Violence: The Influence of Job Opportunities for Men and Women," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 461-479.
    2. Emin Gahramanov & Khusrav Gaibulloev & Javed Younas, 2022. "Does property ownership by women reduce domestic violence? A case of Latin America," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 548-563, July.
    3. Akyol, Pelin & Kırdar, Murat Güray, 2022. "Compulsory schooling reform and intimate partner violence in Turkey," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Mohammad Amin & Asif M. Islam & Augusto Lopez‐Claros, 2021. "Absent laws and missing women: Can domestic violence legislation reduce female mortality?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 2113-2132, November.
    5. Ojha, Manini & Babbar, Karan, 2023. "Power to choose? Examining the link between contraceptive use and domestic violence," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1336, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Selim Gulesci, 2017. "Forced migration and attitudes towards domestic violence: Evidence from Turkey," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-110, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Bhalotra, Sonia R. & Kambhampati, Uma & Rawlings, Samantha & Siddique, Zahra, 2018. "Intimate Partner Violence and the Business Cycle," IZA Discussion Papers 11274, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Punarjit Roychowdhury & Gaurav Dhamija, 2022. "Don't cross the line: Bounding the causal effect of hypergamy violation on domestic violence in India," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1952-1978, October.
    9. Marco Colagrossi & Claudio Deiana & Andrea Geraci & Ludovica Giua, 2022. "Hang up on stereotypes: Domestic violence and an anti‐abuse helpline campaign," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 585-611, October.
    10. Anders Kjelsrud & Kristin Vikan Sjurgard, 2022. "Public Work and Private Violence," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(9), pages 1791-1806, September.
    11. Marco Caliendo & Robert Mahlstedt & Gerard J. van den Berg & Johan Vikström, 2023. "Side effects of labor market policies," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(2), pages 339-375, April.
    12. Díaz, Juan-José & Saldarriaga, Victor, 2023. "A drop of love? Rainfall shocks and spousal abuse: Evidence from rural Peru," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Ana Tur-Prats, 2017. "Unemployment and intimate-partner violence: A gender-identity approach," Economics Working Papers 1564, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    14. Black, Dan A. & Grogger, Jeffrey & Kirchmaier, Tom & Sanders, Koen, 2023. "Criminal charges, risk assessment and violent recidivism in cases of domestic abuse," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121374, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Lena Janys & Bettina Siflinger, 2021. "Mental Health and Abortions among Young Women: Time-varying Unobserved Heterogeneity, Health Behaviors, and Risky Decisions," Papers 2103.12159, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    16. Pablo Selaya & Neda Trifkovic & Vincent Leyaro, 2023. "Gender altruism and attitudes towards violence against women," DERG working paper series 23-19, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Development Economics Research Group (DERG).
    17. Gustavo J Bobonis & Roberto Castro & Juan S Morales, 2020. "Legal Reforms, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Mexico," Working Papers tecipa-678, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    18. García-Ramos, Aixa, 2021. "Divorce laws and intimate partner violence: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Juliane Hennecke & Astrid Pape, 2022. "Suddenly a stay-at-home dad? Short- and long-term consequences of fathers’ job loss on time investment in the household," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 579-607, June.
    20. Louis-Philippe Béladn & Abel Brodeur & Joanne Haddad & Derek Mikola, 2021. "Determinants of Family Stress and Domestic Violence: Lessons from the COVID-19 Outbreak," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 47(3), pages 439-459, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16258-:d:993557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.