IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13767-d950860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of Rural Outdoor Dining Environment from Consumer Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mian Yang

    (Faculty of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610000, China
    Faculty of Art, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Wenjie Fan

    (Faculty of Art, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Jian Qiu

    (Faculty of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Sining Zhang

    (Faculty of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Jinting Li

    (Faculty of Art, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610000, China)

Abstract

The quality of the environment should be measured by the satisfaction of the public and guided by the issues of public concern. With the development of the internet, social media as the main platform for people to exchange information has become a data source for planning and management analysis. Nowadays, the rural catering industry is becoming increasingly competitive, especially after the pandemic. How to further enhance the competitiveness of the rural catering industry has become a hot topic in the industry. From the perspective of consumers, we explored consumers’ preferences in a rural outdoor dining environment through social media data. The research analyzed the social media data through manual collection and object detection, divided the landscape of the rural outdoor dining environment into eight categories with 35 landscape elements, and then used BP (Back Propagation) neural network nonlinear fitting and least square linear fitting to analyze the 11,410 effective review pictures from eight rural restaurants’ social media comments in Chengdu. We derived the degree of consumer preference for the landscape quality of the rural outdoor dining environment and analyzed the differences in preference among three different groups (regular customers, customers with children, and customers with the elderly). The study found that agricultural resources are an important factor in the competitiveness of rural restaurant environments; that children’s emotions when using activity facilities can positively influence consumers’ dining experiences; that safety and hygiene environment are important factors influencing the decisions of parent–child dining; and that older people are more interested in outdoor nature, etc. The research results provide suggestions and knowledge for rural restaurant managers and designers through human-oriented needs from the perspective of consumers, and clarify the preferences and expectations of different consumer groups for rural restaurant landscapes while achieving the goal of rural landscape protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Mian Yang & Wenjie Fan & Jian Qiu & Sining Zhang & Jinting Li, 2022. "The Evaluation of Rural Outdoor Dining Environment from Consumer Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13767-:d:950860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Gibson & Susan Olivia & Geua Boe‐Gibson, 2020. "Night Lights In Economics: Sources And Uses," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 955-980, December.
    2. Wei Liu & Chenggu Li & Yao Tong & Jing Zhang & Zuopeng Ma, 2020. "The Places Children Go: Understanding Spatial Patterns and Formation Mechanism for Children’s Commercial Activity Space in Changchun City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Chiara Rinaldi, 2017. "Food and Gastronomy for Sustainable Place Development: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Different Theoretical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Zhang, Yonglin & Li, Shanlin & Dong, Rencai & Deng, Hongbing & Fu, Xiao & Wang, Chenxing & Yu, Tianshu & Jia, Tianxia & Zhao, Jingzhu, 2021. "Quantifying physical and psychological perceptions of urban scenes using deep learning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Stavroula Angelaki & Georgios A. Triantafyllidis & Ute Besenecker, 2022. "Lighting in Kindergartens: Towards Innovative Design Concepts for Lighting Design in Kindergartens Based on Children’s Perception of Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Labrecque, JoAnne & Ricard, Line, 2001. "Children's influence on family decision-making: a restaurant study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 173-176, November.
    7. Susan (Sixue) Jia, 2021. "Analyzing Restaurant Customers’ Evolution of Dining Patterns and Satisfaction during COVID-19 for Sustainable Business Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Ohe, Yasuo & Kurihara, Shinichi, 2013. "Evaluating the complementary relationship between local brand farm products and rural tourism: Evidence from Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 278-283.
    9. Hyo-Sun Jung & Hye-Hyun Yoon & Min-Kyung Song, 2021. "A Study on Dining-Out Trends Using Big Data: Focusing on Changes since COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio V. Carral & Marisa del Río & Zósimo López, 2020. "Gastronomy and Tourism: Socioeconomic and Territorial Implications in Santiago de Compostela-Galiza (NW Spain)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Qingsong He & Miao Yan & Linzi Zheng & Bo Wang & Jiang Zhou, 2023. "The Effect of Urban Form on Urban Shrinkage—A Study of 293 Chinese Cities Using Geodetector," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Dimitris Karagiannis & Meletios Andrinos, 2021. "The Role of Sustainable Restaurant Practices in City Branding: The Case of Athens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Andrea Giampiccoli & Oliver Mtapuri, 2021. "From Conventional to Alternative Tourism: Rebalancing Tourism towards a Community-Based Tourism Approach in Hanoi, Vietnam," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Shuichiro Kajima & Yuta Uchiyama & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "Intellectual Property Strategies for Timber and Forest Products: The Case of Regional Collective Trademark Applications by Japanese Forestry Associations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. GIBSON, John & ZHANG, Xiaoxuan & PARK, Albert & YI, Jiang & XI, Li, 2024. "Remotely measuring rural economic activity and poverty : Do we just need better sensors?," CEI Working Paper Series 2023-08, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Ohe, Y., 2018. "Does Farmer s Identity Make a Difference in Efficiency in Dairy Farms Conducting Educational Tourism? Evaluation by Slacks-based Measure DEA Models," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277533, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2023. "The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem of Food Festivals—A Vendors’ Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Matthieu Charpe, 2023. "Convergence heterogeneity at the local level in sub‐Saharan Africa," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(2), pages 273-305, April.
    10. Hüseyin Pamukçu & Ömer Saraç & Sercan Aytuğar & Mustafa Sandıkçı, 2021. "The Effects of Local Food and Local Products with Geographical Indication on the Development of Tourism Gastronomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Ulpiano J. Vázquez-Martinez & Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2019. "Is Gastronomy A Relevant Factor for Sustainable Tourism? An Empirical Analysis of Spain Country Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Jooyoung Hwang & Anita Eves & Jason L. Stienmetz, 2021. "The Impact of Social Media Use on Consumers’ Restaurant Consumption Experiences: A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-33, June.
    13. Kozak, Metin, 2010. "Holiday taking decisions – The role of spouses," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 489-494.
    14. Gibson, John & Jiang, Yi & Susantono, Bambang, 2023. "Revisiting the role of secondary towns: How different types of urban growth relate to poverty in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    15. Nur Utomo, Mohamad & Kaujan, Kaujan & Mubarak, Ahmad, 2023. "Innovation to Improve the Village Economy Through the Development of Local Wisdom-Based Agro-Tourism, in North Kalimantan, Indonesia," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    16. Agata Nicolosi & Valentina Rosa Laganà & Daniel Laven & Claudio Marcianò & Wilhelm Skoglund, 2019. "Consumer Habits of Local Food: Perspectives from Northern Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Huiqi Song & Pengwei Chen & Yongxun Zhang & Youcheng Chen, 2021. "Study Progress of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS): A Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Flurry, Laura A., 2007. "Children's influence in family decision-making: Examining the impact of the changing American family," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 322-330, April.
    19. Idriss Fontaine & Sabine Garabedian & Hélène Vérèmes, 2022. "The current and future costs of tropical cyclones: A case study of La Réunion," TEPP Working Paper 2022-10, TEPP.
    20. Shapiro, Daniel & Oh, Chang Hoon & Zhang, Peng, 2023. "Nighttime lights data and their implications for IB research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13767-:d:950860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.