IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3338-d356634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Contributing to Retirement Decisions in Denmark: Comparing Employees Who Expect to Retire before, at, and after the State Pension Age

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Meng

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Emil Sundstrup

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Lars L. Andersen

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Aim: Analyse factors affecting retirement decisions comparing employees expecting to retire before, at, and after the state pension age. Methods: In the SeniorWorkingLife cohort, 12,269 workers aged +50 replied to questions about expected retirement age, reasons for leaving, and reasons for staying longer. Results: For all groups, poor health, wish for more leisure, and economy were the most salient expected reasons for retiring. Many would stay longer if there were better possibilities for more leisure time, more work flexibility, and economic benefits. Those expecting to retire before state pension age were more likely to point at desire for more leisure time as expected reason for retiring, and less likely to point at economic reasons, and more likely to point at health and work demands as possible reasons for prolonging working life. Those expecting to retire after state pension age were more likely to point at external factors and recognition from the management. Conclusion: Factors influencing retirement decisions are similar across the groups. Initiatives for better work–life balance, healthy lifestyle, and economic incentives to continue working may help prevent early retirement and motivate prolonging work life beyond retirement. Results also indicate that less strenuous work is particularly relevant to prevent early retirement.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Meng & Emil Sundstrup & Lars L. Andersen, 2020. "Factors Contributing to Retirement Decisions in Denmark: Comparing Employees Who Expect to Retire before, at, and after the State Pension Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3338-:d:356634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianna Virtanen & Tuula Oksanen & G David Batty & Leena Ala-Mursula & Paula Salo & Marko Elovainio & Jaana Pentti & Katinka Lybäck & Jussi Vahtera & Mika Kivimäki, 2014. "Extending Employment beyond the Pensionable Age: A Cohort Study of the Influence of Chronic Diseases, Health Risk Factors, and Working Conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Ewan Carr & Gareth Hagger-Johnson & Jenny Head & Nicola Shelton & Mai Stafford & Stephen Stansfeld & Paola Zaninotto, 2016. "Working conditions as predictors of retirement intentions and exit from paid employment: a 10-year follow-up of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 39-48, March.
    3. Mark Y. An & Bent Jesper Christensen & Nabanita Datta Gupta, 2004. "Multivariate mixed proportional hazard modelling of the joint retirement of married couples," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 687-704.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annette Meng & Emil Sundstrup & Lars L. Andersen, 2022. "Employee perception of managers’ attitudes towards older workers is associated with risk of loss of paid work before state pension age: prospective cohort study with register follow-up," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1375-1383, December.
    2. Denise Burkhalter & Aylin Wagner & Sonja Feer & Frank Wieber & Andreas Ihle & Isabel Baumann, 2022. "Financial Reasons for Working beyond the Statutory Retirement Age: Risk Factors and Associations with Health in Late Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Tomasz Jedynak, 2022. "Does the Formulation of the Decision Problem Affect Retirement?—Framing Effect and Planned Retirement Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Iñigo Calvo-Sotomayor & Ekhi Atutxa & Ricardo Aguado, 2020. "Who Is Afraid of Population Aging? Myths, Challenges and an Open Question from the Civil Economy Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Alina Betlej, 2023. "Social Networks, New Technologies, and Wellbeing—An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Successful Ageing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Kristina Thomassen & Emil Sundstrup & Jonas Vinstrup & Karina Glies Vincents Seeberg & Lars Louis Andersen, 2022. "Barriers and Facilitators of Re-Employment among Senior Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-7, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette Meng & Emil Sundstrup & Lars L. Andersen, 2022. "Employee perception of managers’ attitudes towards older workers is associated with risk of loss of paid work before state pension age: prospective cohort study with register follow-up," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1375-1383, December.
    2. M. Kauppi & K. C. Prakash & M. Virtanen & J. Pentti & V. Aalto & T. Oksanen & M. Kivimäki & J. Vahtera & S. Stenholm, 2021. "Social relationships as predictors of extended employment beyond the pensionable age: a cohort study," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 491-501, December.
    3. Kristina Gyllensten & Kjell Torén & Mats Hagberg & Mia Söderberg, 2020. "A sustainable working life in the car manufacturing industry: The role of psychosocial factors, gender and occupation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Johanna Stengård & Constanze Leineweber & Marianna Virtanen & Hugo Westerlund & Hui-Xin Wang, 2022. "Do good psychosocial working conditions prolong working lives? Findings from a prospective study in Sweden," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 677-688, September.
    5. Peter Browne & Ewan Carr & Maria Fleischmann & Baowen Xue & Stephen A. Stansfeld, 2019. "The relationship between workplace psychosocial environment and retirement intentions and actual retirement: a systematic review," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 73-82, March.
    6. Lalive, Rafael & Parrotta, Pierpaolo, 2017. "How does pension eligibility affect labor supply in couples?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 177-188.
    7. Bo Honoré & Thomas Jørgensen & Áureo de Paula, 2020. "The informativeness of estimation moments," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 797-813, November.
    8. Aviad Tur-Sinai & Harald Künemund & Claudia Vogel, 2022. "Inheritances and work for pay — will the expected wave of bequests undermine active ageing policies?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1251-1261, December.
    9. Bütler, Monika & Huguenin, Olivia & Teppa, Federica, 2004. "What Triggers Early Retirement? Results from Swiss Pension Funds," CEPR Discussion Papers 4394, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Nagore García, Amparo & van Soest, Arthur, 2022. "Joint retirement behaviour and pension reform in the Netherlands," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    11. Monika Bütler & Olivia Huguenin & Federica Teppa, 2005. "Why Forcing People to Save for Retirement May Backfire," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2005 2005-09, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    12. Monika Bütler & Olivia Huguenin & Federica Teppa, 2005. "Why Forcing People to Save Retirement May Backfire," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 05.05, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    13. Bo Honoré & Áureo de Paula, 2011. "Interdependent Durations in Joint Retirement," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2011-5, Center for Retirement Research, revised Feb 2011.
    14. Bo E. Honoré & Thomas Jorgensen & Áureo de Paula, 2019. "Sensitivity of Estimation Precision to Moments with an Application to a Model of Joint Retirement Planning of Couples," CeMMAP working papers CWP36/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Herman J. Bierens & Jose R. Carvalho, 2007. "Semi-nonparametric competing risks analysis of recidivism," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 971-993.
    16. Cantarero-Prieto, David & Pascual-Sáez, Marta & Blázquez-Fernández, Carla, 2018. "Well-being and intended early retirement among older European workers: does job satisfaction matter? A 6-Wave follow-up," MPRA Paper 89077, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Stephen A Stansfeld & Ewan Carr & Melanie Smuk & Charlotte Clark & Emily Murray & Nicola Shelton & Jenny Head, 2018. "Mid-life psychosocial work environment as a predictor of work exit by age 50," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. García-Miralles, Esteban & Leganza, Jonathan M., 2024. "Joint retirement of couples: Evidence from discontinuities in Denmark," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Nicholas, Lauren Hersch & Done, Nicolae & Baum, Micah, 2020. "Lifetime job demands and later life disability," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    20. Pia Hovbrandt & Per-Olof Östergren & Catarina Canivet & Maria Albin & Gunilla Carlsson & Kerstin Nilsson & Carita Håkansson, 2021. "Psychosocial Working Conditions and Social Participation. A 10-Year Follow-Up of Senior Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3338-:d:356634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.