IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1730-d329300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardization of Exchanged Water with Different Properties in China’s Water Rights Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Junyuan Shen

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Fengping Wu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Qianwen Yu

    (Business School, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
    Department of System Designing Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Zhaofang Zhang

    (College of Economic and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Lina Zhang

    (National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing 210098, China
    Business Administration School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China)

  • Min Zhu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Zhou Fang

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Water rights trading is an effective way to optimize the allocation of water resources. However, the existing practice of water rights trading in China lacks any consideration of the practical value of the exchanged water. This deficiency may lead to disputes between transferor and transferee during the implementation of the water rights trading contract. This paper puts forward the concept of Standard Water (SW). First, getting the original value of exchanged water by the shadow price model based on input-output table; Second, based on the original value, building the economic profits or costs model to obtain the practical value of exchanged water; Third, establishing SW quantity measurement model according to the principle of rewarding excellence and punishing inferiority, so as to convert the water quantity of exchanged water into SW quantity. With the standardization method, this paper takes the water rights transaction between Dongyang City and Yiwu City in 2000 as an example to carry out case study, and provides policy recommendations. The results show that when the contract requires the provision of 49.999 million m 3 water of Class I the quality, if the exchanged water quality provided is in Class II-V, the corresponding SW will be decreased to 48.699–37.399 million m 3 . The application of this research will be conducive to ensuring the fairness and durability of the water rights trading processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Junyuan Shen & Fengping Wu & Qianwen Yu & Zhaofang Zhang & Lina Zhang & Min Zhu & Zhou Fang, 2020. "Standardization of Exchanged Water with Different Properties in China’s Water Rights Trading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1730-:d:329300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ignacio Cazcarro & Carlos A. López-Morales & Faye Duchin, 2016. "The global economic costs of the need to treat polluted water," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 295-314, September.
    2. Hamidreza Manshadi & Mohammad Niksokhan & Mojtaba Ardestani, 2015. "A Quantity-Quality Model for Inter-basin Water Transfer System Using Game Theoretic and Virtual Water Approaches," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(13), pages 4573-4588, October.
    3. Dilekli, Naci & Cazcarro, Ignacio, 2019. "Testing the SDG targets on water and sanitation using the world trade model with a waste, wastewater, and recycling framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Mehta, Lyla, 2001. "The Manufacture of Popular Perceptions of Scarcity: Dams and Water-Related Narratives in Gujarat, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2025-2041, December.
    5. Xiuli Liu & Xikang Chen & Shouyang Wang, 2009. "Evaluating and Predicting Shadow Prices of Water Resources in China and Its Nine Major River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1467-1478, June.
    6. Brooks, Robert & Harris, Edwyna, 2008. "Efficiency gains from water markets: Empirical analysis of Watermove in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 391-399, April.
    7. Gayatri Acharya & Edward Barbier, 2002. "Using Domestic Water Analysis to Value Groundwater Recharge in the Hadejia'Jama'are Floodplain, Northern Nigeria," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 415-426.
    8. Daniel W. Bromley, 1985. "Resources and Economic Development: An Institutionalist Perspective," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 779-796, September.
    9. Burness, H Stuart & Quirk, James P, 1979. "Appropriative Water Rights and the Efficient Allocation of Resources," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 25-37, March.
    10. Warford, Jeremy J, 1987. "Natural Resources and Economic Policy in Developing," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 21(3), pages 3-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao-yuan Wu & Feng-ping Wu & Fang Li & Xia Xu, 2021. "Dynamic Adjustment Model of the Water Rights Trading Price Based on Water Resource Scarcity Value Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Chen, Xiang-nan & Li, Fang & Wu, Feng-ping & Xu, Xia & Zhao, Yue, 2023. "Initial water rights allocation of Industry in the Yellow River basin driven by high-quality development," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José M. Rueda-Cantuche & Tamas Revesz & Antonio F. Amores & Agustín Velázquez & Marian Mraz & Emanuele Ferrari & Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé & Letizia Montinari & Bert Saveyn, 2020. "Improving the European input–output database for global trade analysis," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Weber, Marian L., 2001. "Markets for Water Rights under Environmental Constraints," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 53-64, July.
    3. Henry Thompson, 2013. "Resource Rights and Markets in a General Equilibrium Model of Production," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 131-139, September.
    4. Enrique Ballestero, 2004. "Inter-Basin Water Transfer Public Agreements: A Decision Approach to Quantity and Price," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(1), pages 75-88, February.
    5. Itay Fischhendler & David Katz, 2013. "The use of “security” jargon in sustainable development discourse: evidence from UN Commission on Sustainable Development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 321-342, September.
    6. Murphy, David M. A. & Berazneva, Julia & Lee, David R., 2015. "Fuelwood Source Substitution and Shadow Prices in Western Kenya," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205084, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Cobourn, Kelly M. & Ji, Xinde & Mooney, Sian & Crescenti, Neil, 2017. "Water right seniority, economic efficiency and land allocation decisions," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258271, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Faye Duchin, 2017. "Resources for Sustainable Economic Development: A Framework for Evaluating Infrastructure System Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Dietrich Earnhart & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2023. "Adapting to water restrictions: Intensive versus extensive adaptation over time differentiated by water right seniority," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1458-1490, October.
    10. Zhisong Chen & Lingling Pei, 2018. "Inter-Basin Water Transfer Green Supply Chain Equilibrium and Coordination under Social Welfare Maximization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Saleth, Rathinasamy Maria & Dinar, Ariel, 2008. "Impact synergies, institutions, and food security: an evaluation methodology with empirical results," IWMI Conference Proceedings 273363, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Gohar, Abdelaziz A. & Ward, Frank A., 2010. "Gains from expanded irrigation water trading in Egypt: An integrated basin approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2535-2548, October.
    13. Alex Coram & Lyle Noakes, 2009. "The optimal extraction of water along an arbitrarily configured river system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(2), pages 251-264, April.
    14. Bromley, Daniel W., 1985. "Natural Resources and Agricultural Development in the Tropics: Is Conflict Inevitable?," 1985 Conference, August 26-September 4, 1985, Malaga, Spain 182579, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. William Nikolakis & Quentin Grafton, 2011. "Are there incentives to integrate to land and water management across northern Australia?," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 10109, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    16. Lijun Jiao & Ruimin Liu & Linfang Wang & Lin Li & Leiping Cao, 2021. "Evaluating Spatiotemporal Variations in the Impact of Inter-basin Water Transfer Projects in Water-receiving Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5409-5429, December.
    17. Raffensperger, John F., 2011. "Matching users' rights to available groundwater," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1041-1050, April.
    18. Berck, Peter & Lipow, Jonathan, 1994. "Real and ideal water rights: the prospects for water-rights reform in Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank," CUDARE Working Papers 43743, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Njiraini, Georgina W. & Thiam, Djiby Racine & Muchapondwa, Edwin, 2016. "Implications of water policy reforms on water use efficiency and quality in South Africa: The Olifants river basin," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246440, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    20. Schoengold, Karina & Zilberman, David, 2004. "Is Equity A Constraint? Applications To Block Rate And Other Pricing Schemes With Heterogeneous Users," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19945, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1730-:d:329300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.