IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i9p2041-d1382788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand Time Series Prediction of Stacked Long Short-Term Memory Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Based on Fused Attention Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Chengyu Yang

    (School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Han Zhou

    (School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Ximing Chen

    (School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jiejun Huang

    (School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

The layout and configuration of urban infrastructure are essential for the orderly operation and healthy development of cities. With the promotion and popularization of new energy vehicles, the modeling and prediction of charging pile usage and allocation have garnered significant attention from governments and enterprises. Short-term demand forecasting for charging piles is crucial for their efficient operation. However, existing prediction models lack a discussion on the appropriate time window, resulting in limitations in station-level predictions. Recognizing the temporal nature of charging pile occupancy, this paper proposes a novel stacked-LSTM model called attention-SLSTM that integrates an attention mechanism to predict the charging demand of electric vehicles at the station level over the next few hours. To evaluate its performance, this paper compares it with several methods. The experimental results demonstrate that the attention-SLSTM model outperforms both LSTM and stacked-LSTM models. Deep learning methods generally outperform traditional time series forecasting methods. In the test set, MAE is 1.6860, RMSE is 2.5040, and MAPE is 9.7680%. Compared to the stacked-LSTM model, MAE and RMSE are reduced by 4.7%and 5%, respectively; while MAPE value decreases by 1.3%, making it superior to LSTM overall. Furthermore, subsequent experiments compare prediction performance among different charging stations, which confirms that the attention-SLSTM model exhibits excellent predictive capabilities within a six-step (2 h) window.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengyu Yang & Han Zhou & Ximing Chen & Jiejun Huang, 2024. "Demand Time Series Prediction of Stacked Long Short-Term Memory Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Based on Fused Attention Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2041-:d:1382788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buzna, Luboš & De Falco, Pasquale & Ferruzzi, Gabriella & Khormali, Shahab & Proto, Daniela & Refa, Nazir & Straka, Milan & van der Poel, Gijs, 2021. "An ensemble methodology for hierarchical probabilistic electric vehicle load forecasting at regular charging stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Tian Mao & Xin Zhang & Baorong Zhou, 2019. "Intelligent Energy Management Algorithms for EV-charging Scheduling with Consideration of Multiple EV Charging Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Fischer, Thomas & Krauss, Christopher, 2018. "Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 654-669.
    4. Shafqat Jawad & Junyong Liu, 2023. "Electrical Vehicle Charging Load Mobility Analysis Based on a Spatial–Temporal Method in Urban Electrified-Transportation Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Fang, Kai & Li, Chenglin & Tang, Yiqi & He, Jianjian & Song, Junnian, 2022. "China’s pathways to peak carbon emissions: New insights from various industrial sectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Dai & Yuan An & Wen Long, 2021. "Price change prediction of ultra high frequency financial data based on temporal convolutional network," Papers 2107.00261, arXiv.org.
    2. Shao, Zhen & Zheng, Qingru & Yang, Shanlin & Gao, Fei & Cheng, Manli & Zhang, Qiang & Liu, Chen, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the electricity clearing price: A novel BELM based pattern classification framework and a comparative analytic study on multi-layer BELM and LSTM," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Kamaladdin Fataliyev & Aneesh Chivukula & Mukesh Prasad & Wei Liu, 2021. "Stock Market Analysis with Text Data: A Review," Papers 2106.12985, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    4. Zhou, Xinxing & Gao, Yan & Wang, Ping & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wu, Zhanchi, 2022. "Does herding behavior exist in China's carbon markets?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    5. Giacomo di Tollo & Joseph Andria & Gianni Filograsso, 2023. "The Predictive Power of Social Media Sentiment: Evidence from Cryptocurrencies and Stock Markets Using NLP and Stochastic ANNs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Ghosh, Indranil & Chaudhuri, Tamal Datta & Alfaro-Cortés, Esteban & Gámez, Matías & García, Noelia, 2022. "A hybrid approach to forecasting futures prices with simultaneous consideration of optimality in ensemble feature selection and advanced artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Sina Montazeri & Akram Mirzaeinia & Haseebullah Jumakhan & Amir Mirzaeinia, 2024. "CNN-DRL for Scalable Actions in Finance," Papers 2401.06179, arXiv.org.
    8. Alameer, Zakaria & Elaziz, Mohamed Abd & Ewees, Ahmed A. & Ye, Haiwang & Jianhua, Zhang, 2019. "Forecasting gold price fluctuations using improved multilayer perceptron neural network and whale optimization algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 250-260.
    9. Rad, Hossein & Low, Rand Kwong Yew & Miffre, Joëlle & Faff, Robert, 2023. "The commodity risk premium and neural networks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Mst. Shapna Akter & Hossain Shahriar & Reaz Chowdhury & M. R. C. Mahdy, 2022. "Forecasting the Risk Factor of Frontier Markets: A Novel Stacking Ensemble of Neural Network Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Noura Metawa & Mohamemd I. Alghamdi & Ibrahim M. El-Hasnony & Mohamed Elhoseny, 2021. "Return Rate Prediction in Blockchain Financial Products Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami & Katsuya Ito & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "Deep Portfolio Optimization via Distributional Prediction of Residual Factors," Papers 2012.07245, arXiv.org.
    13. Kailai Ni & Jianzhou Wang & Guangyu Tang & Danxiang Wei, 2019. "Research and Application of a Novel Hybrid Model Based on a Deep Neural Network for Electricity Load Forecasting: A Case Study in Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Jie Fang & Jianwu Lin & Shutao Xia & Yong Jiang & Zhikang Xia & Xiang Liu, 2020. "Neural Network-based Automatic Factor Construction," Papers 2008.06225, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    15. Yang, Yi & Qin, Huan, 2024. "The uncertainties of the carbon peak and the temporal and regional heterogeneity of its driving factors in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Qing, Xiangyun & Niu, Yugang, 2018. "Hourly day-ahead solar irradiance prediction using weather forecasts by LSTM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 461-468.
    17. James Wallbridge, 2020. "Transformers for Limit Order Books," Papers 2003.00130, arXiv.org.
    18. Burka, Dávid & Puppe, Clemens & Szepesváry, László & Tasnádi, Attila, 2022. "Voting: A machine learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1003-1017.
    19. Jian Wang & Haiping Si & Zhao Gao & Lei Shi, 2022. "Winter Wheat Yield Prediction Using an LSTM Model from MODIS LAI Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Chi Chen & Li Zhao & Wei Cao & Jiang Bian & Chunxiao Xing, 2020. "Trimming the Sail: A Second-order Learning Paradigm for Stock Prediction," Papers 2002.06878, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2041-:d:1382788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.