IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i10p2287-d1391392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solvent Exsolution and Liberation from Different Heavy Oil–Solvent Systems in Bulk Phases and Porous Media: A Comparison Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zou

    (Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC), Petroleum Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Yongan Gu

    (Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC), Petroleum Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

Abstract

In this paper, experimental and numerical studies were conducted to differentiate solvent exsolution and liberation processes from different heavy oil–solvent systems in bulk phases and porous media. Experimentally, two series of constant-composition-expansion (CCE) tests in a PVT cell and differential fluid production (DFP) tests in a sandpacked model were performed and compared in the heavy oil–CO 2 , heavy oil–CH 4 , and heavy oil–C 3 H 8 systems. The experimental results showed that the solvent exsolution from each heavy oil–solvent system in the porous media occurred at a higher pressure. The measured bubble-nucleation pressures ( P n ) of the heavy oil–CO 2 system, heavy oil–CH 4 system, and heavy oil–C 3 H 8 system in the porous media were 0.24 MPa, 0.90 MPa, and 0.02 MPa higher than those in the bulk phases, respectively. In addition, the nucleation of CH 4 bubbles was found to be more instantaneous than that of CO 2 or C 3 H 8 bubbles. Numerically, a robust kinetic reaction model in the commercial CMG-STARS module was utilized to simulate the gas exsolution and liberation processes of the CCE and DFP tests. The respective reaction frequency factors for gas exsolution ( rff e ) and liberation ( rff l ) were obtained in the numerical simulations. Higher values of rff e were found for the tests in the porous media in comparison with those in the bulk phases, suggesting that the presence of the porous media facilitated the gas exsolution. The magnitudes of rff e for the three different heavy oil–solvent systems followed the order of CO 2 > CH 4 > C 3 H 8 in the bulk phases and CH 4 > CO 2 > C 3 H 8 in the porous media. Hence, CO 2 was exsolved from the heavy oil most readily in the bulk phases, whereas CH 4 was exsolved from the heavy oil most easily in the porous media. Among the three solvents, CH 4 was also found most difficult to be liberated from the heavy oil in the DFP test with the lowest rff l of 0.00019 min −1 . This study indicates that foamy-oil evolution processes in the heavy oil reservoirs are rather different from those observed from the bulk-phase tests, such as the PVT tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zou & Yongan Gu, 2024. "Solvent Exsolution and Liberation from Different Heavy Oil–Solvent Systems in Bulk Phases and Porous Media: A Comparison Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:2287-:d:1391392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/10/2287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:2287-:d:1391392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.