IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5424-d873066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Exploration and Production Sharing Agreements Using the Taguchi Method

Author

Listed:
  • Saad Balhasan

    (Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah P.O. Box 10021, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mohammed Alnahhal

    (Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah P.O. Box 10021, United Arab Emirates)

  • Brian Towler

    (Retired from Chemical Engineering School, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Bashir Salah

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Ruzayqat

    (Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Duisburg-Essen, Keetmanstraße 3-9, 47058 Duisburg, Germany)

  • Mosab I. Tabash

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Business, Al Ain University, Al Ain P.O. Box 64141, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The short- and long-term volatility of oil and gas prices has a wide-ranging impact on both parties of petroleum contractual agreements, thus affecting the profitability of the project at any stage. Therefore, the government (first party) and the international oil company (second party) set the parameters of their contracts in a way that reduces the uncertainty. The effect of price fluctuations on economic indicators is investigated in this paper. The Taguchi method is used for the first time to find the best-agreement parameters, which are the “A” and “B” factors, in the standard Libyan agreement. There are four “A” components from “A1” to “A4”, and four “B” components from “B1” to “B4”. The purpose is to reduce the variability in the response variables, which are the company take (the percent of net cash flow for the international company) and average value of the second-party percent share of production (ASPS). The noise factors considered in this paper are oil, liquefied hydrocarbon byproduct (LHP), and gas prices. The method was applied to a case study of oil field development in Libya. The results showed that “A3” and “A4” were the most important control factors that affect the ASPS, while “B2” and “B3” are the most important factors affecting the company take. To obtain robust results, the most important factors to reduce variability were also determined. The effect of control parameters on the average NPV may be worth more than USD 22 MM in the 1-billion-barrel oilfield case study. The results showed that, for a given combination of “A” and “B” factors with a certain company take, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of the NPV of the second party was reduced by 18% if the optimal combinations of the levels were used.

Suggested Citation

  • Saad Balhasan & Mohammed Alnahhal & Brian Towler & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "Robust Exploration and Production Sharing Agreements Using the Taguchi Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5424-:d:873066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5424/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5424/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awa DIOUF & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2017. "Oil contracts and government take : Issues for Senegal and developing countries," Working Papers P209, FERDI.
    2. Aamna Al Shehhi & Muataz Al Hazza & Mohammed Alnahhal & Ahmad Sakhrieh & Mohamed Al Zarooni, 2021. "Challenges and Barriers for Renewable Energy Implementation in the United Arab Emirates: Empirical Study," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 158-164.
    3. Shen, Yifan & Shi, Xunpeng & Zeng, Ting, 2017. "Global Uncertainty, Macroeconomic Activity and Commodity Price," MPRA Paper 90089, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Nov 2018.
    4. Muhammad Amin Durrani & Iftikhar Ahmad & Manabu Kano & Shinji Hasebe, 2018. "An Artificial Intelligence Method for Energy Efficient Operation of Crude Distillation Units under Uncertain Feed Composition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Yang, Lu, 2019. "Connectedness of economic policy uncertainty and oil price shocks in a time domain perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 219-233.
    7. Fatima Dirani & Tatiana Ponomarenko, 2021. "Contractual Systems in the Oil and Gas Sector: Current Status and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Saad A. Balhasan & Brian F. Towler & Jennifer L. Miskimins, 2013. "Modifying the Libyan fiscal regime to optimise its oil reserves and attract more foreign capital part 1: LEPSA I proposal," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 37(2), pages 220-246, June.
    9. Lyu, Yongjian & Yi, Heling & Wei, Yu & Yang, Mo, 2021. "Revisiting the role of economic uncertainty in oil price fluctuations: Evidence from a new time-varying oil market model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Yan Ding & Yue Liu & Pierre Failler, 2022. "The Impact of Uncertainties on Crude Oil Prices: Based on a Quantile-on-Quantile Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    11. Zhenghui Li & Zimei Huang & Pierre Failler, 2022. "Dynamic Correlation between Crude Oil Price and Investor Sentiment in China: Heterogeneous and Asymmetric Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Marko Kolovrat & Lucija Jukić & Daria Karasalihović Sedlar, 2021. "Comparison of Hydrocarbon Fiscal Regimes of Some European Oil and Gas Producers and Perspectives for Improvement in the Republic of Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Wint Thiri Swe & Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi, 2018. "Assessment of Upstream Petroleum Fiscal Regimes in Myanmar," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Natalia Romasheva & Diana Dmitrieva, 2021. "Energy Resources Exploitation in the Russian Arctic: Challenges and Prospects for the Sustainable Development of the Ecosystem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-31, December.
    15. Saad A. Balhasan & Brian F. Towler & Jennifer L. Miskimins, 2013. "Modifying the Libyan fiscal regime to optimise its oil reserves and attract more foreign capital part 2: application to CO 2 -EOR project in Libya," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 37(3), pages 270-313, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Dokas & Georgios Oikonomou & Minas Panagiotidis & Eleftherios Spyromitros, 2023. "Macroeconomic and Uncertainty Shocks’ Effects on Energy Prices: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    2. Yan Ding & Yue Liu & Pierre Failler, 2022. "The Impact of Uncertainties on Crude Oil Prices: Based on a Quantile-on-Quantile Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Yingce Yang & Junjie Guo & Ruihong He, 2023. "The Asymmetric Impact of the Oil Price and Disaggregate Shocks on Economic Policy Uncertainty: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    4. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    5. Grégoire Rota-Graziosi & Fayçal Sawadogo, 2020. "The tax burden on mobile network operators in Africa," Working Papers hal-03109370, HAL.
    6. Yuan, Di & Li, Sufang & Li, Rong & Zhang, Feipeng, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty, oil and stock markets in BRIC: Evidence from quantiles analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Raza, Syed Ali & Masood, Amna & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Urom, Christian, 2023. "Forecasting the volatility of precious metals prices with global economic policy uncertainty in pre and during the COVID-19 period: Novel evidence from the GARCH-MIDAS approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Aharon, David Y. & Azman Aziz, Mukhriz Izraf & Kallir, Ido, 2023. "Oil price shocks and inflation: A cross-national examination in the ASEAN5+3 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Fasanya, Ismail O. & Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. & Adetokunbo, Abiodun M., 2021. "On the connection between oil and global foreign exchange markets: The role of economic policy uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Yanling Li & Mengxin Wang & Gaoke Liao & Junxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Spillover Effect and Threshold Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Farmers’ Income Growth—Based on Provincial Data of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Lijuan Zhang & Tatyana Ponomarenko, 2023. "Directions for Sustainable Development of China’s Coal Industry in the Post-Epidemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    12. Zhu, Bo & Lin, Renda & Deng, Yuanyue & Chen, Pingshe & Chevallier, Julien, 2021. "Intersectoral systemic risk spillovers between energy and agriculture under the financial and COVID-19 crises," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Bai, Rui, 2021. "Oil prices and economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from global, oil importers, and exporters’ perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Gu, Xin & Zhu, Zixiang & Yu, Minli, 2021. "The macro effects of GPR and EPU indexes over the global oil market—Are the two types of uncertainty shock alike?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Bei Zhang & Xiaoqing Ai & Xingming Fang & Shi Chen, 2022. "The Transmission Mechanisms and Impacts of Oil Price Fluctuations: Evidence from DSGE Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Xin Yang & Shan Chen & Hong Liu & Xiaoguang Yang & Chuangxia Huang, 2023. "Jump volatility spillover network based measurement of systemic importance of Chinese financial institutions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1201-1213, April.
    17. Oktay Ozkan & Salah Abosedra & Arshian Sharif & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2024. "Dynamic volatility among fossil energy, clean energy and major assets: evidence from the novel DCC-GARCH," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Jieqiong Wang & Shichao Hu & Ziyi Zhang, 2023. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Eco-Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Firms?—Empirical Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Bobasu, Alina & Geis, André & Quaglietti, Lucia & Ricci, Martino, 2021. "Tracking global economic uncertainty: implications for the euro area," Working Paper Series 2541, European Central Bank.
    20. Wei, Yu & Zhang, Yaojie & Wang, Yudong, 2022. "Information connectedness of international crude oil futures: Evidence from SC, WTI, and Brent," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5424-:d:873066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.