IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i5p702-d1385738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worldwide Examination of Magnetic Responses to Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Xuanxuan Zhao

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Jiaxing Zhang

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Ruijun Ma

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Hui Luo

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Tao Wan

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Dongyang Yu

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Key Laboratory of Key Technology on Agricultural Machine and Equipment, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Yuanqian Hong

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Over the last decade, a large number of studies have been conducted on heavy metals and magnetic susceptibility ( χ l f ) measurement in soils. Yet, a global understanding of soil contamination and magnetic responses remains elusive due to the limited scope or sampling sites of these studies. Hence, we attempted to explore a pollution proxy on a global scale. Through a meta-analysis of data from 102 published studies, our research aimed to provide a worldwide overview of heavy metal pollution and magnetic responses in agriculture soils. We mapped the geographic distribution of nine heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, As, Cd, Mn, and Fe) in agricultural soils and explored their pollution sources and contributions. Since 2011, The accumulation of heavy metals has escalated, with industrial activities (31.5%) being the largest contributor, followed by agricultural inputs (27.1%), atmospheric deposition (22.66%), and natural sources (18.74%). The study reports χ l f ranging from 6.45 × 10 −8 m 3 /kg to 319.23 × 10 −8 m 3 /kg and χ f d from 0.59% and 12.85%, with the majority of the samples being below 6%, indicating heavy metal influence mainly from human activities. Pearson’s correlation and redundancy analysis show significant positive correlations of Pb, Zn, and Cu with χ l f (r = 0.51–0.53) and Mn and Fe with χ f d (r = 0.50–0.53), while Pb, Zn, Cu, and As metals were shown to be key factors of variation in magnetic response. The average heavy metal pollution load index of 2.03 suggests moderate global agricultural soil pollution, with higher heavy metal contamination in areas of high χ l f . Regression analysis confirms soil is considered to be non-polluted below χ l f of 26 × 10 − 8 m 3 / k g and polluted above this threshold, with all contamination factors of metals showing a linear correlation with χ l f (R = 0.72), indicating that a significant relationship between χ l f and the geochemical properties of soils continues to exist on a global scale. This study provides new insights for large-scale agricultural soil quality assessment and magnetic response.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuanxuan Zhao & Jiaxing Zhang & Ruijun Ma & Hui Luo & Tao Wan & Dongyang Yu & Yuanqian Hong, 2024. "Worldwide Examination of Magnetic Responses to Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:702-:d:1385738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:702-:d:1385738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.