IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/35022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into the Working Experience of Casual Academics and Their Immediate Supervisors

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, D
  • Perrott, B
  • Perry, L.J.

Abstract

"The increasing use of casual university academics has been an issue of concern to researchers and commentators for some time. Research to date has tended to focus on the plight of casuals who aspire to permanent positions, and emphasising issues such as career dissatisfaction, exploitation, and marginalisation. Little evidence has been gathered that quantifies the views of casuals more broadly. Less still has been gathered on the perceptions of the immediate supervisors of casuals. This article seeks to compare the perceptions of a cohort of casuals and their immediate supervisors. Both quantitative and qualitative data are gathered via a survey of academic staff employed in the business faculty of a large metropolitan university. The survey results indicate, among other things, a high level of mutual satisfaction between casuals and their immediate supervisors. Casuals also expressed a high level of general satisfaction with their work as casual staff. These and other findings are discussed in some detail."

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, D & Perrott, B & Perry, L.J., 2014. "Insights into the Working Experience of Casual Academics and Their Immediate Supervisors," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:35022
    Note: "Davis, D., Perrott, B., Perry, L.J., 2014. Insights into the Working Experience of Casual Academics and Their Immediate Supervisors. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol.40 No.1, pp. 46-67"
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/35022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:35022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.