IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3ap386-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rationale for Increasing the Theoretical Understanding on the Basic Concepts of Economic Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Evgenij Petrovich Vasilyev
  • Irina Vladimirovna Filimonenko
  • Tatyana Petrovna Likhacheva
  • Irina Rudolfovna Rouiga

Abstract

The issues dealing with the process of making rational decisions in the production and consumption, an accurate assessment of results and costs in the economy have been the focus of attention for many generations of economists. Assessment of results and costs in the economy are always associated with consideration of the prices for different types of resources. However, some underlying aspects of prices still require further comprehensive consideration. By now, the economic essence of such basic concepts of economic theory as money, price, and utility have not been studied thoroughly, on an appropriate theoretical level. Therefore, one cannot provide a monistic theoretical justification for many economic phenomena such economic processes as forecasting prices for economic resources, optimization of the market economy operation according to the theories of economic welfare, social (collective) choice, general equilibrium, etc. This study aims to increase the theoretical understanding of the basic concepts of economic theory, which would enable to eliminate inconsistencies and contradictions in their interpretation at the fundamental and applied levels of research. The methods of scientific abstraction, system and comparative analysis of mathematical models aiming to establish their possible inconsistency and incompatibility, a logical method, as well as economic and mathematical modeling were used as a methodological basis of the research. Upon conducting a comparative analysis of economic and mathematical models that describe the foundations of the economy, we identified their logical inconsistency and discrepancies with the underlying nature of prices, money and utility. Having analyzed utility functions and the “function of social or aggregated utility†, we proved the need for changing the traditional form of these functions, the need to introduce new phenomena, both individual utility functions and social utility functions that consider the system (emergent) characteristics of the economy. The authors propose considering the system (emergent) characteristics of the economy as: the matrix structure of the economy and the limited cyclic-temporal potential of its lifespan. We believe that the focus on the system (emergent) content characteristic of the nature of prices will allow a more accurate prediction and regulation of their future dynamics, and this will also enable to overcome one of the main contradictions of economic theory between the theoretical basis of consumer choices that are made according to utility values and the practical basis of these choices which are always made according to cost parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenij Petrovich Vasilyev & Irina Vladimirovna Filimonenko & Tatyana Petrovna Likhacheva & Irina Rudolfovna Rouiga, 2017. "The Rationale for Increasing the Theoretical Understanding on the Basic Concepts of Economic Theory," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 386-407.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:386-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pociovalisteanu Diana-Mihaela & Thalassinos Eleftherios, 2009. "The Structural Funds and the Economic and Social Cohesion Process," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 313-330, May.
    2. Ostroy, Joseph M, 1973. "The Informational Efficiency of Monetary Exchange," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(4), pages 597-610, September.
    3. Friedman, Milton, 1991. "Old Wine in New Bottles," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(404), pages 33-40, January.
    4. Alexander M. Zobov & Ekaterina A. Degtereva & Veronica Yu. Chernova & Vasily S. Starostin, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of the Best Practices in the Economic Policy of Import Substitution," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 507-520.
    5. Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu & Emilian M. Dobrescu, 2009. "The Role of Structural Funds in Economic and Social Cohesion Process," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 27-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Dmitrievna Burkaltseva & Olga Sergeevna Sivash & Oleg Valerievich Boychenko & Lyubov Vasilievna Savchenko & Tatyana Nikolaevna Bugaeva & Snezhana Anatolyevna Zotova, 2017. "Realization of Investment Processes in the Agricultural Sector of the Digital Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 366-379.
    2. Adijati Utaminingsih & Sony Heru Priyanto & John J.O.I. Ihalauw & Linda Kusuma, 2020. "Green Business Behaviour, Green Technologies, and Sustainability in SMEs," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 417-424.
    3. Grigory Viktorovich Prytkov & Natalia Yurievna Tsvetus & Artem Alexandrovich Balyakin & Andrey Sergeevich Malyshev & Sergey Borisovich Taranenko, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the Development and Use of Large Research Infrastructure," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 338-353.
    4. Prof. Dr. Ion Criveanu & Dr. Ec. Loredana Iordache, 2015. "Establishing Human Resources Strategies and Policies Correlating with Company's Objectives," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 3-10.
    5. Mirela Cristea & Eleftherios Thalassinos, 2016. "Private Pension Plans: An Important Component of the Financial Market," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 110-115.
    6. Vasily I. Vlasov & Galina B. Vlasova & Svetlana V. Denisenko & Olga V. Litvinova, 2017. "The Basic Principles of the European State and Dynamics of the Political and Legal Development within the Russian Federation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 225-233.
    7. Dumitrache Vlad Ionut & Constantinescu Maria, 2016. "EU Security Challenges and Their Economic Implications," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 3-28.
    8. Adam Albekov & Natalia Vovchenko & Yevgeniya Medvedkina & Taras Medvedkin, 2017. "Green Economy and Economic Growth: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities for the EU," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 49-62.
    9. Zbigniew Glabinski, 2023. "Perception of the Significance of Tourism Development Based on the Example of the Residents of Sławno County (Western Pomerania, Poland)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 224-245.
    10. Irina Ilina & Elena Kryukova & Elena Potekhina & Elena Abyzova & Irina Shadskaja, 2017. "Russian Lectures at the Crossroads of Reforms: Strategies of Survival and Adaptation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 86-97.
    11. Lisa Kustina & Junedi, 2017. "ASEAN Economic Community Impact on SMSs: A Regional Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 432-438.
    12. Przemyslaw Pluskota, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of the Use of Financial Instruments – Regional Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 602-611.
    13. Oxana Leonidovna Chulanova & Gulnara Hamitovna Kucherenko & Dmitry Viktorovich Chulanov & Andrey Vladimirovich Kirillov & Aleksandr V. Melnichuk, 2017. "Crowd-Technology in the Selection of Personnel," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 380-397.
    14. I Made Adnyana & Hasanudin & Andini Nurwulandari, 2020. "Empirical Examination of Intersectoral Linkages Between Tourism and Regional Economy by Using the Social Accounting Matrix," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 292-298.
    15. Constantin Zaman & Bogdan Meunier, 2017. "A Decade of EU Membership: Evolution of Competitiveness in Romania," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 224-236.
    16. Petr Mach, 2018. "VAT Rates and their Impact on Business and Tax Revenue," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 144-152.
    17. I.G. Napalkova & N.E. Orlova & P.S. Samygin & G.B. Vlasova, 2017. "The Impact of European Law on the Development of Legal System of Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 77-86.
    18. T.V. Shatkovskaya & N.G. Romanenko & Y.A. Naumenko & E.A. Parshina, 2017. "The Problem of Individualization of Legal Entities in Terms of Innovative Development of the Russian Federation and the European Union Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 162-171.
    19. Huseyin Ozdeser, 2018. "Separation Process of Britain From the EU and its Impacts on Both Sides," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 14-23.
    20. Aleksey Vladimirovich Gribanov & Vladimir Vladimirovich Mitrokhin & Mariya Viktorovna Vilkova, 2017. "Innovation as the Main Factor for Sustainable Development of a Commercial Bank," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 408-416.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:386-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.