IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial4p65-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of the Process Improvement Exigency Related to Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Zavadsky
  • Zuzana Zavadska
  • Katarzyna Szczepanska-Woszczyna

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this paper is to develop the I4 necessity index for quantification of process improvement exigency related to I4. Design/Methodology/Approach: Based on literature review and previous research, we decided to develop a new I4N index. This index is not intended to identify the current state of Industry 4.0 or the company's readiness for this concept, but to assess the need to implement I4. By implementing I4 we mean mostly the deployment of intelligent technologies, informatization and automation of business processes. Our philosophy is to develop a simple design for a minimum number of factors that may give rise to an internal or external need to implement I4. The secondary output of the I4N index is the quantification of the level of process improvement potential related to the selected production and logistic processes. Findings: We emphasize, it as a demand or more specifically, an exigency, rather than a readiness for Industry 4.0. We developed an Industry 4.0 necessity index (I4N index). We assigned weights to individual factors in order to quantify the process improvement exigency related to I4 and we used the list of manufacturing and logistic processes from previous research. We did not apply the list of intelligent technologies, although most indexes of the I4 readiness also take these technologies into account. Practical Implications: The basic approach of our research was to create a mathematical model that could easily quantify the potential for improving business processes related to Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Zavadsky & Zuzana Zavadska & Katarzyna Szczepanska-Woszczyna, 2021. "Quantification of the Process Improvement Exigency Related to Industry 4.0," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 65-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:65-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2583/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakgasem RAMINGWONG & Wapee MANOPINIWES & Varattaya JANGKRAJARNG, 2019. "Human Factors Of Thailand Toward Industry 4.0," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 15-25, March.
    2. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Dashi Nazarov & Anton Klarin, 2020. "Taxonomy of Industry 4.0 research: Mapping scholarship and industry insights," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 535-556, July.
    4. Ryszard Borowiecki & Zbigniew Olesinski & Agnieszka Rzepka & Katarzyna Hys, 2021. "Development of Teal Organisations in Economy 4.0: An Empirical Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 117-129.
    5. Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Vukašin Kuč & Veljko M. Mijušković & Tomislav Herceg, 2020. "Challenges and Driving Forces for Industry 4.0 Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Erwin Rauch & Marco Unterhofer & Rafael A. Rojas & Luca Gualtieri & Manuel Woschank & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "A Maturity Level-Based Assessment Tool to Enhance the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. František Simetinger & Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, 2020. "Deriving secondary traits of industry 4.0: A comparative analysis of significant maturity models," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 663-678, July.
    8. S. Vasin & L. Gamidullaeva & E. Shkarupeta & I. Palatkin & T. Vasina, 2018. "Emerging Trends and Opportunities for Industry 4.0 Development in Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 63-76.
    9. Christian Hoyer & Indra Gunawan & Carmen Haule Reaiche, 2020. "The Implementation of Industry 4.0 – A Systematic Literature Review of the Key Factors," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 557-578, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Jiang & Jinlong Gai & Shukuan Zhao & Peggy E. Chaudhry & Sohail S. Chaudhry, 2022. "Applications and development of artificial intelligence system from the perspective of system science: A bibliometric review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 361-378, May.
    2. Li Da Xu, 2020. "Industry 4.0—Frontiers of fourth industrial revolution," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 531-534, July.
    3. Ricci, Riccardo & Battaglia, Daniele & Neirotti, Paolo, 2021. "External knowledge search, opportunity recognition and industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Cihan Ünal & Cemil Sungur & Hakan Yildirim, 2022. "Application of the Maturity Model in Industrial Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Roland Zs. Szabo & Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Robert Hanák & Lilla Hortovanyi & Anita Romanová & Marian Mocan & Dragan Djuričin, 2020. "Industry 4.0 Implementation in B2B Companies: Cross-Country Empirical Evidence on Digital Transformation in the CEE Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Yilmaz, Aysegul & Dora, Manoj & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Kumar, Maneesh, 2022. "Lean and industry 4.0: Mapping determinants and barriers from a social, environmental, and operational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Usama Awan & Robert Sroufe & Karoly Bozan, 2022. "Designing Value Chains for Industry 4.0 and a Circular Economy: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Teixeira, Josélia Elvira & Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa C.P., 2022. "Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Artur Pollak & Agata Hilarowicz & Maciej Walczak & Damian Gąsiorek, 2020. "A Framework of Action for Implementation of Industry 4.0. an Empirically Based Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Titov Sergei & Trachuk Arkady & Linder Natalya & RD Pathak & Danny Samson & Zafar Husain & S Sushil, 2023. "Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 801-843, November.
    12. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Flavio S. Fogliatto & Michel J. Anzanello & Alejandro Mac Cawley Vergara & Roberto Vassolo & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Modeling the impact of industry 4.0 base technologies on the development of organizational learning capabilities," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1091-1104, September.
    13. Mukherjee, Abheek Anjan & Raj, Alok & Aggarwal, Shikha, 2023. "Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    14. Asongu, Simplice & Rahman, Mushfiqur & Nnanna, Joseph & Haffar, Mohamed, 2020. "Enhancing Information Technology for Value Added Across Economic Sectors in Sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 107238, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    16. Vardan Mkrttchian & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Alexey Finogeev & Serge Chernyshenko & Vsevolod Chernyshenko & Danis Amirov & Irina Potapova, 2021. "Big Data and Internet of Things (IoT) Technologies' Influence on Higher Education: Current State and Future Prospects," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 16(5), pages 137-157, September.
    17. Elibal, Kerem & Özceylan, Eren, 2022. "Comparing industry 4.0 maturity models in the perspective of TQM principles using Fuzzy MCDM methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Magdalena Czerwinska & Slawomir Przylucki, 2021. "The Criterion of Place of Residence in Research on the Knowledge of Industry 4.0 in a Group of IT Students," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 716-729.
    19. Zeki Murat Çınar & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan, 2021. "A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-32, June.
    20. Szymon Jarosz & Mariusz Soltysik & Malgorzata Zakrzewska, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Light of Social and Competence Changes," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 530-548.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Process improvement; Industry 4.0; necessity index; exigency factors.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:65-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.