IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2bp68-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe Business in a Pandemic Risk Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Parkitna

Abstract

Purpose: Defining the concept of safe business by identifying the risks of SME business in a pandemic environment. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was based on a deductive approach and was conducted in the first months of the pandemic in 2020 in the Lower Silesia. The research technique used GOOGLE electronic survey questionnaire and the collected data was statistically processed (SPSS). The study used sample, which allowed to select a set of population elements and determine the representativeness and reliability of the research sample. The thesis and hypothesis presented were verified based on the data collected in the quantitative study. The specificity of the distributions of the variables was established. Nonparametric tests were used to analyze the data. Correlations between variables were tested using Spearman's test. Findings: The conclusions of the study confirmed the mutual correlation between the "new" pandemic risk and the other "old" risk classes . This may indicate the impact of a rare "nuclear swan" phenomenon, the effects of which have not been and are not yet described in the literature. Practical Implications: The analysis of the results obtained in the study is partially consistent with the literature studies on the impact of the environment and the risks associated with it on micro and small enterprises conducted before the pandemic. Nevertheless, the assumptions made at the stage of selecting the research sample, allow to formulate a thesis about the broader universality of the confirmed regularities, which should be confirmed in extended research. Which is an important contribution to further discussion. Originality/value: The paper describes the diagnosed competence gap in the area of SME enterprise management in the current economic conditions of the pandemic. Which is an extremely complicated task due to the lack of precedents giving guidance to enterprises resulting from history and literature on the subject. In view of this, the identification of risk and definition of the concept of safe business in such unusual conditions, which are at the same time adequate to the dynamically changing environment under pandemic conditions, is a desirable goal to achieve in scientific and practical aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Parkitna, 2021. "Safe Business in a Pandemic Risk Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 68-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:68-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2203/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yevgen Bogodistov & Veit Wohlgemuth, 2017. "Enterprise risk management: a capability-based perspective," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 234-251, May.
    2. O.V. Andreeva & E.V. Shevchik, 2017. "Organizational and Financial Modeling of Transnational Industrial Clusters Sustainable Development: Experience, Risks, Management Innovation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 137-147.
    3. Donard Games & Ranggi Putri Rendi, 2019. "The effects of knowledge management and risk taking on SME financial performance in creative industries in an emerging market: the mediating effect of innovation outcomes," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ghatak S. & Seale J., 2001. "Rice, Risk and Rationality: Supply Response in West Bengal, India," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 155-155, July - De.
    5. Pavla Breckova, 2016. "SMEs Export Activities in the Czech Republic and Export Risk Insuring," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 84-92.
    6. Syed Ali Abbas, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and information technology businesses in economic crisis," Post-Print hal-01829732, HAL.
    7. Patrick Kreiser & Louis Marino & Donald Kuratko & K. Weaver, 2013. "Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 273-291, February.
    8. Syed Ali Abbas, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and information technology businesses in economic crisis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 682-692, March.
    9. Asep Risman & Ubud Salim & Sumiati Sumiati & Nur Khusniyah Indrawati, 2017. "Commodity Prices, Exchange Rates and Investment on Firm's Value Mediated by Business Risk: A Case from Indonesian Stock Exchange," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 511-524.
    10. Gabriela ANGHELACHE & Ana-Cornelia OLTEANU (PUIU) & Alina-Nicoleta RADU, 2010. "Operational Risk Measurement," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 215-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef Tabsh & Vida Davidavičienė, 2019. "Effects of ICT’s on energy management systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2194-2206, June.
    2. Shah Muhammad Kamran & Mahvish Kanwal Khaskhely & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities via Distant Socialization and Social Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Kristina Samašonok & Margarita Išoraitė & Lina Žirnelė, 2020. "Education of entrepreneurship by participation in a business simulation enterprise activities: conditions of effectiveness and opportunities for improvement," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3122-3144, June.
    4. Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Sarmini, 2021. "Public Behavior as an Output of E-Government Service: The Role of New Technology Integrated in E-Government and Antecedent of Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    6. Taufiq Marwa & Abdul Bashir & Azwardi & Mohamad Adam & K.M.H. Thamrin, 2017. "Market Integration of Agricultural Products," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 69-82.
    7. Águeda Gil-López & Unai Arzubiaga & Elena San Román & Alfredo Massis, 2022. "The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1033-1071, September.
    8. Michael Sheppard, 2020. "The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 195-219, March.
    9. Songling Yang & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Irina Solovjova, 2017. "Access to Finance for Latvian SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 57-68.
    11. Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto, 2018. "Effective Enterprise Communication and Learning Attitude in Business Performance: A Case Study on SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 55-68.
    12. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Cuevas-Romo, Ana & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Díaz-Acevedo, Natalie & Albores, Pavel & Despoudi, Stella & Malesios, Chrisovalantis & Dey, Prasanta, 2022. "The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    13. Y. Yolanda, 2017. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Inflation and its Impact on Human Development Index and Poverty in Indonesia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 38-56.
    14. Tatiana Papiashvili & Svetlana Saksonova & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2017. "FDI Attraction: Comparative Analysis of the Baltic States and Georgia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 81-93.
    15. A.A. Alukhanyan & A.V. Andreeva & L.Yu. Andreeva, 2017. "Instruments of Marketing and Credit Support of the Large Industrial Enterprises Development: International Experience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 294-310.
    16. Istipliler, Baris & Bort, Suleika & Woywode, Michael, 2023. "Flowers of adversity: Institutional constraints and innovative SMEs in transition economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. YACOUBI Larbi, 2024. "Factors Underlying Organizational Resilience in SMEs," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 1458-1469, February.
    18. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:55-68 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:69-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ayinde, Opeyemi Eyitayo & Bessler, David Arnold & Oni, Femi Emmanuel, 2017. "Analysis Of Supply Response And Price Risk On Rice Production In Nigeria," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 43(1), March.
    21. Wenting Chen & Chunjia Han & Lei Wang & Petros Ieromonachou & Xiaochen Lu, 2021. "Recognition of entrepreneur’s social ties and firm innovation in emerging markets: explanation from the industrial institutional environment and survival pressure," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 491-518, June.
    22. Eva Maria Lado Gonzalez & Domingo Calvo Dopico, 2017. "The Importance of Intangible Assets in the Strategic Management of the Firm: An Empirical Application for Banco Santander," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 177-196.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SME enterprises; risk.;

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • P12 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Enterprises
    • P42 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:68-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.