IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/omjpps/omj-03-2021-1169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Moderated mediation roles of psychological ownership and belief in just world

Author

Listed:
  • Fullchis Nurtjahjani
  • Ridolof Wenand Batilmurik
  • Ayu Fury Puspita
  • Jappy Parlindungan Fanggidae

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to investigate the mediating and moderating effects of psychological ownership and belief in just world in the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Design/methodology/approach - The data were collected from 183 lecturers who teach in an Indonesian university. The questionnaires covered transformational leadership, psychological ownership, belief in just world and work engagement. The collected data were examined with structural equation model analysis. Findings - The results demonstrated a significant moderated mediation index, which indicated that the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement is mediated by psychological ownership and is moderated by belief in just world. Practical implications - To achieve higher work engagement, organizations should increase employees’ feelings of ownership and boost just world belief. Originality/value - The present study offers new insight on how personality trait plays a moderating role in the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Fullchis Nurtjahjani & Ridolof Wenand Batilmurik & Ayu Fury Puspita & Jappy Parlindungan Fanggidae, 2021. "The relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Moderated mediation roles of psychological ownership and belief in just world," Organization Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 47-59, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-03-2021-1169
    DOI: 10.1108/OMJ-03-2021-1169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-03-2021-1169/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-03-2021-1169/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/OMJ-03-2021-1169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-03-2021-1169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.