IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mlppss/03090550710816492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting whistleblowers at work

Author

Listed:
  • David Lewis
  • Tina Uys

Abstract

Purpose - The paper proposes to compare the relative success of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (UK) and the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 (South Africa) in providing protection for whistleblowers in the UK and South Africa. Design/methodology/approach - The assessment is conducted in the light of case law in both countries and empirical research previously conducted. Findings - The most important feature of the relevant statutes in both countries is that they recognise the need to protect workers who disclose in the public interest. Although the current provisions are important first steps, it is believed that much more needs to be done. Practical implications - In the light of this research, 14 suggestions are made for change. Originality/value - The article makes proposals for reform to the legislation in both countries. It also attempts to provide guidance to practitioners by identifying good practice in handling concerns about wrongdoing.

Suggested Citation

  • David Lewis & Tina Uys, 2007. "Protecting whistleblowers at work," Managerial Law, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 76-92, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mlppss:03090550710816492
    DOI: 10.1108/03090550710816492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03090550710816492/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03090550710816492/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/03090550710816492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mlppss:03090550710816492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.