IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/jfrc-09-2016-0072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of efficiency measures to compute welfare improving: an application for competition policy

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Ferro
  • Sonia León

Abstract

Purpose - Merger approving focuses on both market power and welfare gains. In general, the approval process does not include a comparative efficiency analysis. This paper aims to introduce this dimension and show its potential. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the analysis of past bank mergers, the authors examine expected and actual efficiency gains. This paper measures the potential (ex ante) and ex post efficiency gains of bank mergers by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Findings - The authors find some (approved) mergers were promised and yielded efficiency gains while others did not. Research limitations/implications - DEA does not allow testing statistically the significance of the presumed relationship between variables. Practical implications - The authors conclude that some mergers that took place would not have been approved had an efficiency analysis been made. Social implications - Regulators and/or competition authorities could approve mergers which do not increase efficiency. Originality/value - To date, efficiency frontier analysis has not been performed for merger approval. It implies that the regulator or competition authority could allow mergers with no clear social gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Ferro & Sonia León, 2018. "The use of efficiency measures to compute welfare improving: an application for competition policy," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 227-245, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-09-2016-0072
    DOI: 10.1108/JFRC-09-2016-0072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-09-2016-0072/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-09-2016-0072/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JFRC-09-2016-0072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-09-2016-0072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.