IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/inmrpp/inmr-01-2019-0005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic production and technological emergence in finance

Author

Listed:
  • Itamir Caciatori Junior
  • Ana Paula Mussi Szabo Cherobim

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way. Design/methodology/approach - This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper. Findings - The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects. Originality/value - The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowledge (e.g. information technology, business and law) and lack of consensus in theories to explain the matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Itamir Caciatori Junior & Ana Paula Mussi Szabo Cherobim, 2020. "Academic production and technological emergence in finance," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 115-131, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-01-2019-0005
    DOI: 10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/INMR-01-2019-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-01-2019-0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.