IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/elg/ejeepi/v8y2011i1p183-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Sraffa, post-Keynesian theories of pricing and capitalist competition: Some observations

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Blankenburg

    (School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, UK)

Abstract

The paper explores the implications of the 1920s 'cost controversy' for heterodox economic theory (here limited to post-Keynesian and Sraffian analysis). It argues that neither neoclassical nor heterodox theories have found viable solutions to the basic dilemma posed by the 'cost controversy', namely how to reconcile a general theory of price with that of growth and accumulation. The a priori commitment of neoclassical theory to a symmetric theory of exchange and production means that the impasses met by Walrasian general equilibrium theory and by the New Endogenous Growth Theory cannot be resolved, while also preserving explanatory power. For the case of post-Keynesian and Sraffian theory, it is suggested that, while a claim to "a general theory of everything" is also unsustainable, a reconsideration of the methodological roots of Sraffa’s own analysis and of core aspects of classical theories of competition, might open an avenue to providing an empirically relevant heterodox theory of contemporary corporate capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Blankenburg, 2011. "On Sraffa, post-Keynesian theories of pricing and capitalist competition: Some observations," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 183-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p183-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/ejeep/8-1/ejeep.2011.01.13.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. C. Harcourt, 1981. "Marshall, Sraffa and Keynes: Incompatible Bedfellows," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 39-50, Jan-Mar.
    2. Alan P. Kirman, 1992. "Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 117-136, Spring.
    3. Unknown, 1992. "1992 Winter," CWAE Newsletter, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Committee on Women in Agricultural Economics (CWAE), pages 1-16.
    4. Kriesler, P., 1992. "Answers for Steedman," Papers 92-1, New South Wales - School of Economics.
    5. anonymous, 2009. "Which came first—democracy or growth?," Inside the Vault, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Spring.
    6. Corsi, Marcella & Guarini, Giulio, 2009. "Growth and institutions in Paolo Sylos Labini's thought," MPRA Paper 19431, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kaldor, Nicholas, 1972. "The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1237-1255, December.
    8. -, 2009. "Economic growth in the Caribbean," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38668, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Unknown, 1992. "992 Spring, Volume 6, Number ," COSBAE Newsletter, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Committee on the Opportunities and Status of Blacks in Agricultural Economics (COSBAE), pages 1-11.
    10. Clifton, James A, 1977. "Competition and the Evolution of the Capitalist Mode of Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(2), pages 137-151, June.
    11. Hicks, J. R., 1975. "Value and Capital: An Inquiry into some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780198282693.
    12. Richard Arena & Agnès Festré, 2006. "Knowledge, Beliefs and Economics," Post-Print halshs-00271316, HAL.
    13. Sonnenschein, Hugo, 1972. "Market Excess Demand Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 549-563, May.
    14. Richard Arena, 2007. "La théorie de l'oligopole de Sylos Labini : diversité des interprétations et prolongements possibles," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 4-4.
    15. Unknown, 1992. "1992 Spring," CWAE Newsletter, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Committee on Women in Agricultural Economics (CWAE), pages 1-16.
    16. Kirman, Alan, 1989. "The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(395), pages 126-139, Supplemen.
    17. Garegnani, Pierangelo, 1979. "Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand: A Reply to Joan Robinson," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(2), pages 181-187, June.
    18. Xavier Vives, 2001. "Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026272040x, December.
    19. Fine, Ben, 2000. "Endogenous Growth Theory: A Critical Assessment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(2), pages 245-265, March.
    20. Fisher, Franklin M., 1973. "Stability and competitive equilibrium in two models of search and individual price adjustment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 446-470, October.
    21. Bernard Walliser, 2006. "Justifications of game equilibrium notions," Post-Print halshs-00754735, HAL.
    22. Mark Setterfield, 1997. "Rapid Growth and Relative Decline," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37587-1, September.
    23. Frederic S. Lee & Peter E. Earl (ed.), 1993. "The Economics of Competitive Enterprise," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 279.
    24. J. E. King, 2002. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2135.
    25. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, 1997. "I Just Ran Two Million Regressions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 178-183, May.
    26. Pasinetti, Luigi L, 1988. "Sraffa on Income Distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(1), pages 135-138, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Landini & Mauro Gallegati & J. Barkley Rosser, 2020. "Consistency and incompleteness in general equilibrium theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 205-230, January.
    2. Gallegati, Mauro & Kirman, Alan, 2019. "20 years of WEHIA: A journey in search of a safer road," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 5-14.
    3. Sabiou M. Inoua & Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "The Classical Theory of Supply and Demand," Working Papers 20-11, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    4. G. Fagiolo & A. Roventini, 2009. "On the Scientific Status of Economic Policy: A Tale of Alternative Paradigms," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 6.
    5. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2013. "Material needs and aggregate demand," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-26.
    6. Barbara Dluhosch, 2011. "European Economics at a Crossroads, by J. Barkley Rosser, Jr., Richard P. F. Holt, and David Colander," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 629-631, August.
    7. Frank Ackerman, 2001. "Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 119-139.
    8. Giovanni Dosi, 2024. "Why is economics the only discipline with so many curves going up and down? There is an alternative," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Marchionatti, Roberto & Sella, Lisa, 2015. "Is Neo-Walrasian Macroeconomics a Dead End?," CESMEP Working Papers 201502, University of Turin.
    10. Jamee K. Moudud, 2010. "Strategic Competition, Dynamics, and the Role of the State," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4241.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Andrea Roventini, 2019. "More is different ... and complex! the case for agent-based macroeconomics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-37, March.
    12. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 1997. "Economics and the return to Mecca: The recognition of novelty and emergence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 399-412, October.
    13. Vernon L. Smith & Sabiou M. Inoua, 2019. "Classical Economics: Lost and Found," Working Papers 19-15, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    14. D. Wade Hands, 2012. "The Rise and Fall of Walrasian Microeconomics: The Keynesian Effect," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Neil Hart & Peter Kriesler, 2014. "Keynes, Kalecki, Sraffa: Coherence?," Discussion Papers 2014-06, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    16. J. Barkley Rosser Jr & Richard P.F. Holt & David Colander, 2010. "European Economics at a Crossroads," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13585.
    17. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos & Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, 1996. "The relative autonomy of macroeconomics: a methodological approach," Textos para discussão 49, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    18. Jefferson Andronio Ramundo Staduto & Knut Ingar Westeren & Clarissa Pereira Junqueira, 2012. "The Knowledge, Learning and Innovation Process: A Poultry Cluster in the Western Region of the State of Parana, Brazil," Chapters, in: Knut Ingar Westeren (ed.), Foundations of the Knowledge Economy, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Knut Ingar Westeren (ed.), 2012. "Foundations of the Knowledge Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14606.
    20. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cost controversy; Sraffa; post-Keynesian theory of pricing; classical theory of competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General
    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p183-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Phillip Thompson (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elgaronline.com/ejeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.